GE05 LIVE: The spreads

Nothing very interesting happening in the real world, so I’ve been hanging out with the spread firms and betting exchanges. Following the money is likely to be more accurate than believing some bloke working for a state broadcaster standing outside the polling station with a clipboard.

The differences between the spreads and the exit polls are interesting. Not much different in the Labour majority. But the Lib Dems seem to be trading about 10 seats above their 53 predicted by the BBC. They are currently buying on IG around 65; Cantor around 68. Both predict 250-ish for Labour and 205 for the Tories. A spinnable night for them all, then. But as you were for the third term.

UPDATE: Spreads again. There’s plenty of action on the seats front, but the vote shares have hardly shifted all night. The spreads: Labour 34-36; Conservative 33-35; Liberal Democrats 22-26. Some of our foreign readers may be wondering how that translates into a sizeable governing majority for one party. Some of our domestic visitors, too, I can tell you.

UPDATE @ 02:40: The scores on the doors so far:

LAB 224
CON 39
LD 23

UPDATE 2.55 a.m.: After being down in the mid 40s about an hour ago, Cantor are now saying the Labour majority will be 68-70, in line with BBC predictions.

(Posted by Election Night guest pundit Jarndyce.)


Posted on May 5th, 2005 at 11:55 pm

See also
GE05 LIVE: BBC EXIT POLL
On Message
By the numbers
   
Permalink
Trackback

Subscribe By Email
Print This Post


Filed under 2005 General Election, UK politics
 

250 Comments

  1. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:03 Permalink | Reply

    But what do the punters know that the pundits don’t?

  2. Dave Heasman on 06.05.2005 at 00:05 Permalink | Reply

    “Both predict 250-ish for Labour and 205 for the Tories.”

    That’ll be “350-ish for Labour”?

  3. CuriousHamster on 06.05.2005 at 00:10 Permalink | Reply

    Where’s everyone gone? You should never have jumped threadc like that. You hear Blunkett and Paxman just now? Class TV (in an extremely aggravating way).

  4. CuriousHamster on 06.05.2005 at 00:11 Permalink | Reply

    Doh, I missed a post. *feels sheepish*
    You can provide your own Aberdeen/sheep jokes.

  5. Jarndyce on 06.05.2005 at 00:12 Permalink | Reply

    Sorry, Dave. Got way too many windows open here. Correct. Punters get all sorts of information, no? I told you earlier about Edinburgh South. That was money talking. Seems it may now be true.

  6. EK on 06.05.2005 at 00:13 Permalink | Reply

    If Labour’s majority is as reduced as early indications suggest, what of ID cards? Scottish Labour MPs voting to impose them on the English, or the whole shitty exercise dead in the water?

    (God, if only Jon Culshaw was as funny as he thinks he is. He’ll be doing Tom Baker next.)

  7. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 00:13 Permalink | Reply

    Justin: read “wisdom of the crowds” by james surowiecki, who, despite his terrible taste in titles, has a lot of very interesting examples to support his theory that the aggregated results of a large, diverse, non-expert groups of independently acting people with access to information are always better at predictions than small groups of experts.

    Often even the best expert’s guess is not as good as that of the decision market as a whole. All markets are a form of decision market and betting is the one that adheres closest to surowiecki’s model.

    He tells the story of the challenger disaster, how the stock market judged, within two days, that the company at fault was the one that was found, six months later, to have been at fault. Bloody good book. If you like Gladwell, you’ll like surowiecky, who is the new yorker’s financial writer.

  8. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:14 Permalink | Reply

    CH: Yeah, I’m still trying to get the hang of the liveblogging.

    I think I’ll stick to the comments unless something big happens.

    Stop Press: Galloway ahead in Bethnal Green.

  9. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 00:15 Permalink | Reply

    Hmm. That was a bit long and pretentious. Bottom line: read that book and you will find out why, more often than not, the punters are more right than the pundits.

  10. EK on 06.05.2005 at 00:15 Permalink | Reply

    How come ITV have got 11 for Labour whilst the BBC still have them at 4?

  11. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 00:17 Permalink | Reply

    EK: Is ITV 2005’s answer to 2000’s CBS?

  12. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:18 Permalink | Reply

    Cheers Kate - not at all pretentious. I’m immensely flattered that people like you are taking the time to broaden my mind.

  13. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 00:19 Permalink | Reply

    Are we over here now?

    ITV are trying the merkin thing of pre-declaring

  14. Ryan Morrison on 06.05.2005 at 00:22 Permalink | Reply

    SKY News are showing 5 as well so I’m sticking with the BBC.

  15. CuriousHamster on 06.05.2005 at 00:24 Permalink | Reply

    Gorgeous ahead? That’ll put the cat amoung the pigeons.

    ITV - are they really declaring ahead of the official announcements? Yikes.

  16. Jarndyce on 06.05.2005 at 00:24 Permalink | Reply

    Also Katie, people tend to make better decisions when money is on the line. (That’s why ideas like demand-revealing referenda work.) It sharpens the mind. If you’re into all that sort of thing there’s a UK blogger called Stumbling and Mumbling you’d probably like. Left wing, free-marketeering libertarian economist. Long title. Brilliant guy. Google him

  17. Jarndyce on 06.05.2005 at 00:25 Permalink | Reply

    BTW, info from Bow is rumour. 5 Live saying they haven’t even started the count yet.

  18. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 00:28 Permalink | Reply

    Justin: Now I’m really blushing. Just an economics geek who likes the cartoons in the new yorker.

    Thanks Jarndyce I will. You know, I work from home, and thanks to my ever expanding aggregator I am doing fewer and fewer hours a week. I really am fitting in in France. The lazy 35 hour goitres.

  19. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:32 Permalink | Reply

    Katie: Do you not have a blog of youre own? Blogging’s the new black you know. According to the Guardian, at least.

    Latest:

    9% swing to LDs in Rotheram
    6% swing to LDs in Vauxhall

    Confirmed turnout still awful.

  20. Scribbles on 06.05.2005 at 00:36 Permalink | Reply

    Putney

    I have just puked

  21. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:38 Permalink | Reply

    Scribble: Where do you stand on all this. Do you not think a few seats shaved off the Labour majority would be a good thing?

  22. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 00:38 Permalink | Reply

    My blog is an expat-themed one. I keep politics out of it. I keep a sounding-off blog for my own political moments. It’s more for personal amusement and writing practice. I don’t promote it. My dad reads it. But that’s cause he had my vote.

    I write both anonymously because I got threatened by some assyrians over an article I wrote at ak13.com, and my original blog from 2003 made it ridiculously easy to find me. My second piece for them was anonymous too as a consequence. I was a bit shaken by the whole thing.

  23. Will on 06.05.2005 at 00:39 Permalink | Reply

    I’d say Blair’s nose is starting to look pretty bloody. For better or worse…

  24. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 00:41 Permalink | Reply

    Correction: My primary, public blog is an expat-themed one. I keep politics out of it.

  25. Ken on 06.05.2005 at 00:41 Permalink | Reply

    Putney’s just fallen. But as I have explained at Militant Moderate, switches to the Lib Dems aren’t really a major factor at all. Here it’s just a direct switch in results for Labour and Tory candidates. What this goes to show is that too much hypothecating on safe seat swings is unproductive.

  26. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 00:42 Permalink | Reply

    Katie, been very glad of anonymity with the BNP trying to find out who I am and where I live in this election. Think I might have read your assyrian piece, I have a blurred memory of the controversy…

  27. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:42 Permalink | Reply

    Katie: That’s a real shame. It’d be great to see your writing - if you want to email me offsite I’ll keep it to myself.

    If you decide to go public again let me know.

  28. EK on 06.05.2005 at 00:44 Permalink | Reply

    A majority of less than 60 is now odds-on with Betfair.

  29. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:45 Permalink | Reply

    Bob Marshall Andrews thinks he’s lost Medway. Jesus, good news for Blair.

  30. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:46 Permalink | Reply

    EK: I’d buy that for a dollar

  31. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 00:46 Permalink | Reply

    He’ll be asking you to join his new group blog Katie next…he doesn’t ask everyone to join that *sob*

  32. Scribbles on 06.05.2005 at 00:47 Permalink | Reply

    Justin - do want Labour to have a lower majority (even tho Labour supporter), but I want the Tories stamped on until gurgling for last breath.

    Looking good for Lib Dems, which sits well with me, happy with Lib Dems thoughts on id cards and civil liberty.

    CAN NOT STAND that people went anywhere near Tories in this election, though. Faith in human nature reduced.

  33. EK on 06.05.2005 at 00:49 Permalink | Reply

    Bob Marshall Andrews - the Stepford Blairites at Harry’s Place will love that.

  34. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:50 Permalink | Reply

    Scribble: Nothing would give me greater pleasure than to see the Tories consigned to the dustbin of history. On the other hand, Blair has abused his majority and it needs reigning in - badly.

  35. CuriousHamster on 06.05.2005 at 00:50 Permalink | Reply

    I just heard that there was a 12% swing to the Lib Dems somewhere. I didn’t here where it was.
    Welcome to vague news!
    Less than 60 majority? Oh please let it be true.
    PS - you nice people can call me Garry.

  36. EK on 06.05.2005 at 00:53 Permalink | Reply

    Majority of less than 60 now down to 2-to-1 on. Better night than I could’ve ever imgained.

  37. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:54 Permalink | Reply

    Gary: Apparently the spread betters are buying a sub-60 majority

  38. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 00:54 Permalink | Reply

    Oh the assyrian piece is easy enough to find. It wasn’t even about assyrians. It was about the country that used to be Assyria (iraq.) It was satire, and some guy with a google news feed (keyword “assyrian”) mistook it for simple misinformedness.

    He posted to a bulletin board asking people to correct me and some people made very pertinent interesting comments, that opened my eyes to an issue that’s been forgotten: the “indigenous” people of Iraq and thei oppression by the Kurds. I took the time to visit the board, chat to people, do some reading. I might write a piece about modern day assyrians - very interesting.

    The threats weren’t big. I just realised I should not be so easy to locate. Sorry to hijack server space for personal sob story. Election onwards!

  39. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:55 Permalink | Reply

    This is shaping up to be a good night indeed.

  40. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 00:56 Permalink | Reply

    Katie: Not my server - sob away!

  41. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 00:56 Permalink | Reply

    Aye, like the Nazoreans (sp?) in southern Iraq, who’ve disapperaed over the last couple of decades–

    But you’re right, UK election onwards, Prezzer back in

  42. EK on 06.05.2005 at 00:58 Permalink | Reply

    No overall majority is now trading at less than 7/1, down from 30+/1 a couple of hours ago.

  43. Will on 06.05.2005 at 00:59 Permalink | Reply

    What a fascinating election night. I don’t remember anything like this…

  44. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 01:00 Permalink | Reply

    I love how the bbc news front page map of britain looks like it’s breaking out in hives.

  45. EK on 06.05.2005 at 01:01 Permalink | Reply

    The price on no overall majority is drifting again.

  46. Eddie on 06.05.2005 at 01:03 Permalink | Reply

    Ack… Our Hero Bob Marshall-Andrews is in grave danger.

    Who is going to lead the fight against ID cards from within now?

  47. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 01:04 Permalink | Reply

    The onwders of broadband to see those pustules spreading

  48. Ken on 06.05.2005 at 01:06 Permalink | Reply

    Wow. If Marshall-Andrews is being pinged for the war something is definitely wrong for Labour.

  49. Will on 06.05.2005 at 01:06 Permalink | Reply

    “Who is going to lead the fight against ID cards from within now?”

    The advantage of a low majority is that a lot more Bob M-A’s are going to spring up…

  50. Ken on 06.05.2005 at 01:07 Permalink | Reply

    Will they have the guts to rebel and bring Blair down? I suppose if they know Brown is his replacement, they will.

  51. EK on 06.05.2005 at 01:08 Permalink | Reply

    Andrew Marr got it wrong - Gordon Brown said “I promise that we will learn…” not “We promise that we will learn…”

  52. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:12 Permalink | Reply

    i’ve got a feeling Birmingham Edgbaston could be in soon. Traditional Tory seat held by Labour at the moment by the odious Gisela Stewart if I’m not much mistaken.

  53. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:13 Permalink | Reply

    Blackburn up now

  54. EK on 06.05.2005 at 01:15 Permalink | Reply

    Bloody hell, the BNP beat Craig Murray.

  55. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:16 Permalink | Reply

    Craig Murray - 2082 votes

    Jack Straw - 17,562 and a majority of about 8,000 - down about a 1,000 from last time so the Mislim vote held up for Labour in Blackburn.

    I wonder if the BNP in nearby Oldham was a bigger factor in thinking than Iraq.

  56. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 01:17 Permalink | Reply

    Straw back. Satan chuckles.

    War is Peace, etc.

  57. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:17 Permalink | Reply

    Wait for the smug speech regarding “a renewed mandate”, etc

  58. Will on 06.05.2005 at 01:17 Permalink | Reply

    Bit depresssing, Blackburn.

  59. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:18 Permalink | Reply

    Looks like a recount at Hove is on the cards.

  60. Will on 06.05.2005 at 01:19 Permalink | Reply

    Anyone here present know anyone who’s at the Hove recount?

  61. Drat on 06.05.2005 at 01:19 Permalink | Reply

    Not the straw man…

  62. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 01:19 Permalink | Reply

    Straw down 12%. Big drop but not a typical seat.

  63. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 01:20 Permalink | Reply

    Getting more and more worried about my seat and the BNP

  64. EK on 06.05.2005 at 01:20 Permalink | Reply

    Bit depresssing, Blackburn.

    Isn’t that from a Noel Coward play?

  65. Will on 06.05.2005 at 01:22 Permalink | Reply

    Bit depressing, Blackburn

    It’s a poem by Betjeman

  66. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:23 Permalink | Reply

    let me be the first to sing “10,000 holes in Blackburn, Lancashire”…

  67. EK on 06.05.2005 at 01:24 Permalink | Reply

    Come friendly bombs and drop on Straw…

  68. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 01:25 Permalink | Reply

    Can someone explain to me why it seems to be the tacit agreement between the major political parties not to mention the BNP?

    I mean, I think it is the duty of public political figures to condemn that kind of thing. Ignoring it, pretending that the increasing influence and popularity isn’t happening in an attempt to deny legitimacy surely means that voters are hearing only a “vote for us” message from them, and no rebuttals.

    That’s what happened in France, and how LePen beat out Jospin. The Left wing REALLY needed some nosepegs to bring themselves to vote Chirac. The EU referendum polls switched this week by the way. Second TV broadcast far outstripped the first and he promised to ditch Rafarrin if the electorate goes for a yes.

    Anyway, does anyone know a good reason that nobody mentions BNP?

  69. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:25 Permalink | Reply

    is that what you call poetic justice?

  70. Scribbles on 06.05.2005 at 01:25 Permalink | Reply

    Now, there was a lot of talk with Lib Dem bloggers before this election about proportional representation (as always).

    If this turns out to be a drubbing for Labour, and Lib Dems end up doing very well, can we have at least a little concession that the great British public can, in fact, make their voices heard through the current system?

  71. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:27 Permalink | Reply

    How sick is that - as Asian Mayor/Retuning Officer has just had to announce the result for ‘Nation Front - Britain Before Refugees’ in Peterborough

    SNP have taken the Western Isles from Labour - and I’m buggered if I’m going to try the Gaelic for it.

    Tory gain in Peterborough

  72. Will on 06.05.2005 at 01:27 Permalink | Reply

    It’s still very uncertain whether the Lib Dems really will do that well, despite the swing.

  73. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:27 Permalink | Reply

    How many people carriers does Blair need to take his entourage to the count in Sedgefield!!??

  74. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 01:28 Permalink | Reply

    Spread betting updating in real time. Click on the election icon on the right. (Cheers Jarndyce).

  75. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 01:28 Permalink | Reply

    Come friendly bombs and fall on slough, for there is no hope for it now, there isn’t grass to graze a cow, swarm over death.

    How do the 70’s get Betjeman and we get Andrew “I’ve heard of the rapping” Motion?

  76. EK on 06.05.2005 at 01:29 Permalink | Reply

    Excellent point Katie - ignoring the facists won’t make them go away.

  77. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:29 Permalink | Reply

    Katie - there’s a school of thought which says that you should offer the BNP no platform so you don’t mention them or engage them.

    I managed to annoy the NUS’s Womens Officer last week when she came out with that very line and I tore into her for not being more active and getting in their face on the issues.

  78. CuriousHamster on 06.05.2005 at 01:29 Permalink | Reply

    Katie - I think that the idea is to give the BNP as little legitimacy as possible by ignoring them. Perhaps the other parties should take your advice, they do seem to be getting a disgustingly large number of votes.

    Scribble - No, sorry. PR! PR! PR!

  79. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 01:29 Permalink | Reply

    Matt: Cherie’s a good catholic and Tony’s soon to be if you beleive the rumour - so, they need loads.

  80. Jarndyce on 06.05.2005 at 01:31 Permalink | Reply

    That’s the link in the original post, btw. Good to know you read my carefully smithed words so closely, Just.

  81. EK on 06.05.2005 at 01:32 Permalink | Reply

    Only in Blair’s Britain could Andrew Motion be Laureate.

  82. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 01:33 Permalink | Reply

    You’re a precious bastard, Jarn. That was three beers ago.

    Scribble: Sorry, but the argument for PR are pretty much now unassailable. Time for proper democracy.

  83. EK on 06.05.2005 at 01:34 Permalink | Reply

    facists

    er, fascists

  84. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:34 Permalink | Reply

    Justin: lol - have they already had their “early night” do you think, or maybe they’re postponing it till later?

    As an aside - who is that bloke who manages to say “this is absolutely fascinating” and make is sound as boring as hell?

  85. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 01:35 Permalink | Reply

    Katie, everyone in Keighley went on about the BNP, and all the big name visitors did, without admitting that the rhetoric of both Tory and Labour encouraged their voters

  86. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:37 Permalink | Reply

    bertie: yes, vote Tory, get NF-lite, vote Labour get Tory-lite.

  87. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 01:39 Permalink | Reply

    Matt: the American guy? He’s the poor man’s Bob Worcester (MORI head honcho).

  88. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:39 Permalink | Reply

    here we go…. Edgbaston

  89. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:39 Permalink | Reply

    Edgbaston - Labour hold

  90. EK on 06.05.2005 at 01:40 Permalink | Reply

    Birmingham Edgbaston - check those postal votes

  91. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 01:40 Permalink | Reply

    Where IS WOrcester? (I mean, I’m Wooster…)

  92. Will on 06.05.2005 at 01:40 Permalink | Reply

    Lib Dems end up with 61-64 MPs?

  93. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:40 Permalink | Reply

    is Gisela Stewart having the op? She looks like she’s been taking male hormones.

    I was really hoping she was going to lose that seat - bum…

  94. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:41 Permalink | Reply

    Milburn has stood down from the Cabinet.

  95. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 01:45 Permalink | Reply

    Straw’s on BBC now but complaining of an echo in his earpiece. I thought he was in love with the sound of his own voice.

  96. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 01:46 Permalink | Reply

    Rumour: Galloway wins

  97. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 01:47 Permalink | Reply

    DING DONG Milburn’s gone! That man really got on my nerves.

  98. Will on 06.05.2005 at 01:51 Permalink | Reply

    Peter Snow says…

  99. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 01:51 Permalink | Reply

    I didn’t get the bike by the way. Someone outbid me by 50 cents.

    Assuming a 200ish tory, 65ish lib dem and double digit majority for labour, what’s next?

    I mean, I know everyone thinks Blair would have to go, but what kind of spin can we expect from him in his meagre and pathetic attempt to claw his way back onto the window ledge? What’s the line going to be?

  100. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:52 Permalink | Reply

    Beeb’s first extrapolated forecast from real results -

    LD 59
    CON 201
    LAB 357

    Majority 68

  101. Will on 06.05.2005 at 01:52 Permalink | Reply

    Still Lab maj of 68

  102. Will on 06.05.2005 at 01:53 Permalink | Reply

    Hove about to declare? Did I hear that?

  103. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:53 Permalink | Reply

    Hove result imminent

    Barbara Roche gone in Hornsey - LD gain.

  104. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 01:53 Permalink | Reply

    Also, since I am bad at maths, and you all seem so good, how many holds and how many gains?

  105. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:54 Permalink | Reply

    katie: he’ll say that he is going to listen to the electorate and then carry on as though nothing has happened.

  106. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:54 Permalink | Reply

    Bethnal Green due soon as well

  107. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 01:55 Permalink | Reply

    Roche gone. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

    Come on Will - Hove prediction? Tory I think

  108. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 01:55 Permalink | Reply

    Great result in Hornsey–perhaps local issuse too?

  109. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 01:56 Permalink | Reply

    OUCH, sorry about Hove Justin. At least, as well as your protest vote, you were in a position to influence others too. Cnn-featured blogger that you are.

  110. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:56 Permalink | Reply

    Kaite - its not maths - I’ve got the BBC on TV plus 2 BBC real time feeds on the go from the net.

    LAB -5
    CON +3
    LD +1
    SNP +1

    Hove held by Labour with reduced majority

  111. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 01:56 Permalink | Reply

    Big move LD wise in Hove, just never enough anywhere

  112. matt on 06.05.2005 at 01:57 Permalink | Reply

    “that’s the war”, says Andrew Marr, as though we’d all missed something. After doing his best to play down all the leaks exposing Blair lies, now he’s going to have the brass-neck to pretend he was expecting this all along.

  113. Will on 06.05.2005 at 01:57 Permalink | Reply

    “Brighton’s a very trendy place. Maybe a little of it’s washing off on Hove…” says Dimbleby. Pffff.

  114. CuriousHamster on 06.05.2005 at 01:57 Permalink | Reply

    Milburn is off to spend more time with his family. Again.

    Anne Begg won in Aberdeen South, Pants! Lib Dem was only 1,300 behind.

  115. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 01:58 Permalink | Reply

    No decapitation in Maidenhead - missed Teresa May by 6,000 or so

  116. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 02:01 Permalink | Reply

    Unity: Who need the BBC when I have you lovely people? I prefer having a spot of editorial content that doesn’t have to be looked at by lawyers before it goes up.

  117. Drat on 06.05.2005 at 02:02 Permalink | Reply

    Griffin with 4240? Holy crap.

  118. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:03 Permalink | Reply

    Thinks: I have to remind myself that at 9pm tonight I would have been ecstatic with a Labour majority cut down to 68…

  119. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 02:03 Permalink | Reply

    Nope, that’s a BAD result, that’s less than they got in the local elections in this constituency

  120. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:03 Permalink | Reply

    Dimbleby: Cock.

    I’m surprised about Hove to say the least. I felt sure that the Tories would take it back. Not that I voted for them (or Labour). I just thought that having had the junior minister for civilian casualties representing us for the last eight years something might have shifted.

    CH: Milburn’s off to spend more time with his bank balance.

    Bertie: Labour hold Keighley. That’s a scary turnout of the BNP though.

  121. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:05 Permalink | Reply

    Shit! Griffin got over 4,000 votes

    Cryer back in with slight increase in majority - the Tories lost out to BNP - Howard obviously not quite nasty enough for some

    Interesting trend in Tory LD marginals - votes seem to swtiching straight from Labour to Tories not to LDs.

    Looks like some of the Tories that bought into Blair in 97 & 01 are reverting to type.

  122. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 02:06 Permalink | Reply

    No it’s not Justin, we’ll take that–reduction on last votes. They have 4,500 core voters. And that’s it

  123. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 02:06 Permalink | Reply

    And he got over 6,000 in Oldham last time out

  124. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 02:08 Permalink | Reply

    Blaenau Gwent: is the independent that won it the person who resigned from the labour party and stood against the women’s quota candidate?
    I do dislike that kind of affirmative action leveling of the playing field - you’re addressing symptoms, not causes. It’s easier than long-term change, but it doesn’t make any of us better people.

  125. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:08 Permalink | Reply

    Blair will get a kicking inside the party over the Blaenau Gwent result.

    Nye Bevan’s seat gone because of the authoritarian bastard - some things we on the left won’t ever forgive.

  126. matt on 06.05.2005 at 02:10 Permalink | Reply

    here we go… Darth Campbell speaks!

  127. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:10 Permalink | Reply

    The devil himself is on BBC1

  128. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:10 Permalink | Reply

    New projection on Labour majority creeping up - now 76.

    Spread betting markets were predicting 94 today - same markets were on the button in the US Presidential election when the polls were off.

  129. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:13 Permalink | Reply

    WTF?

    Campbell responsible for bringing GB back into the campaign?

    Is there nothing the slimy bastard won’t try to take the credit for.

  130. matt on 06.05.2005 at 02:14 Permalink | Reply

    I’m glad he’s gone now, I could feel an invisible hand starting to choke the life out of me…..

  131. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:17 Permalink | Reply

    Blaenau Gwent: is the independent that won it the person who resigned from the labour party and stood against the women’s quota candidate?

    I think that says more about Blaenau Gwent than the idea of women-only shortlists, to be honest.

  132. matt on 06.05.2005 at 02:19 Permalink | Reply

    So, our glorious leader is back in Parliament. What can you say to Reg Keys?

  133. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:19 Permalink | Reply

    Blair - 24,000+

    Reg Keys got 4,252 - I make that a deposit saved which is a good result

  134. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:20 Permalink | Reply

    Tony’s back. Looks uncomfortable though.

  135. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:21 Permalink | Reply

    Is it just me or is Blair slowly turning into a Conehead?

    Either that or one of the aliens out of “This Island Earth”

  136. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 02:22 Permalink | Reply

    BBC have a very amusing headline: “voters decide government” Yeah, it’s called universal suffrage dipshits.

  137. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:22 Permalink | Reply

    Tory’s gain Wimbledon - not sure if that’s a result or if they’ve just bought all the tickets for this year already.

  138. matt on 06.05.2005 at 02:22 Permalink | Reply

    Please, not another 4 years or so of those awful, self-righteous homilies.

  139. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:22 Permalink | Reply

    Blair: Vindication. Vindication. Vindication.

  140. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:22 Permalink | Reply

    Katie: I mean, I know everyone thinks Blair would have to go, but what kind of spin can we expect from him in his meagre and pathetic attempt to claw his way back onto the window ledge? What’s the line going to be?

    I think we’re getting a hint of that line…

  141. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:23 Permalink | Reply

    LD gaing in Cardiff Central confirmed - looks to be a massive swing - 17% +

    Lab majority estimate revised up again to 80

  142. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 02:25 Permalink | Reply

    Will: what’s he saying? I’m a sad loner expat with a national holiday tomorrow. feed me!
    Also, I think that your comment about Blaenau gwent proves my point: it’s not a lack of women on the slate that’s stopping more women from getting into parliament. There are larger issues at hand.

  143. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:25 Permalink | Reply

    Oh bollocks - the most irritating LD in the country, John Hemming has won Yardley.

  144. matt on 06.05.2005 at 02:26 Permalink | Reply

    LD gain Birmingham Yardley on a 9% swing. This’ll be the Rover effect - lets hope it affects the other South Brum constituencies.

  145. Bertie on 06.05.2005 at 02:27 Permalink | Reply

    G’night y’all

  146. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:27 Permalink | Reply

    Katie, it’s a repeat of the “Labour must listen..” line that he came out with at the start of the last term. Nothing more interesting than that. A minor act of contrition about presentation rather than substance.

  147. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:28 Permalink | Reply

    From Campbell to Blair and now IDS…

    Can it get any worse? Will they exhume Thatcher next

  148. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:28 Permalink | Reply

    Later, Bertie. Thanks for dropping by.

  149. matt on 06.05.2005 at 02:30 Permalink | Reply

    goodnight Bertie _ i’ll be off soon, too, although this has a kind of car accident-like fascination for me!

  150. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:32 Permalink | Reply

    Matt:

    Hemming win has nothing to do with the ‘Rover effect’.

    There’s no more than around 200 households in Yardley with links to Rover - most car workers in the Area work for Jaguar and Land Rover.

    Trust me, we’ve had Hemming running like a scalded cat on Rover trying not to mention his links to the Phoenix lot that ran the place into the floor.

    He’s also universally loathed up here - even by his own party who’ll be rejoicing not at an LD win but because they’ll now be able to shunt him off to London and into a political siding well away from where he can cause any more damage to the rest of them.

  151. Jarndyce on 06.05.2005 at 02:32 Permalink | Reply

    Why are the Tories so happy with what is, in reality, a massacre?

  152. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:32 Permalink | Reply

    Night Bertie…

  153. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:34 Permalink | Reply

    Labour minister Stephen Twigg gone.

    Galloway’s beaten Oona King by al accounts.

    Shaping up to be a memorable one.

  154. matt on 06.05.2005 at 02:34 Permalink | Reply

    unity: thanks for that. of course, living in Erdington I wouldn’t have a clue about what goes on in Yardley ;-) don’t i look stoopid!

  155. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:35 Permalink | Reply

    Tories reckon they’ve got back Enfield.

    Labour Press office talking in terms of a Galloway win in Bethnal Green.

    Be interesting to see how long his ragbag legion of SWP nutballs and radical Islamists can hold together befor they start poking each other’s eyes out.

  156. Drat on 06.05.2005 at 02:38 Permalink | Reply

    If I hear the word “historic” one more time…

  157. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:39 Permalink | Reply

    Matt:

    Since when did you say you live in Erdington?? ;-)
    Hemming’s still a twat anyway - be interesting to see what happens next. he reckons he’s going to stay on as a councillor, which would keep the Tory/LD alliance running BCC.

    In one way this might not be such a bad result - plenty on our side want shot of Bore and with Hemming out of the frame and Tilsley rumored to favour a deal with Labour on the council, so long as Bore’s out of the Labour Group leadership this could turn out a win-win all round.

  158. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 02:41 Permalink | Reply

    I know! If the Tories are going to win 200 seats they’d better get a bloody move on.

    I mean, I’d like to see the Conservatives have enough of a loss to give them a push towards the libertarian ground, as the Notting Hill bunch’s obsession with John Galt shows it is destined to go if it wishes to win again, but I do indeed want to wipe the smile off his face.

    Apropos of which, the songs that didn’t make it onto that ad were the Beatles “mr taxman,” and tears for fears “Everybody wants to rule the world” and my favourite “there she goes, miss america.” My suggestion? “She works hard for the money.”

  159. matt on 06.05.2005 at 02:41 Permalink | Reply

    i’m gonna sign off now. it’s been a “historic” liveblog, i think we can all agree.

  160. ingerland on 06.05.2005 at 02:42 Permalink | Reply

    Just got back from playing football (some things come before the election) and I see Labour have kept Brighton Pav. and Hove. Very interesting considering they seem to be struggling in the rest of the South, at first glance?

  161. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:42 Permalink | Reply

    David Davis - 22,792

    Back in with increased majority.

  162. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:42 Permalink | Reply

    Cheers Matt - come back soon.

  163. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:44 Permalink | Reply

    Lab held Brighton Pavilion? Shame. Have you got a link for the count, Ingerland?

  164. matt on 06.05.2005 at 02:44 Permalink | Reply

    unity: yep, Stockland Green, Erdington - under the oppressive regime of Sion Simon, Labour Party. I really must go now, so I’ll catch up with you all on the morrow hopefully.

  165. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:44 Permalink | Reply

    Twigg’s face is going to be on an awful lot of papers tomorrow, with the picture of him eight years ago… He rolled his eyes again!

  166. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:44 Permalink | Reply

    Katie:

    Lot of Tory seats won’t declare until around 3:30 - 4:30 AM due to being mainly rural.

    Twigg’s gone and looks sickened by it all.

  167. ingerland on 06.05.2005 at 02:45 Permalink | Reply

    link here, Justin.

  168. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:46 Permalink | Reply

    Top be parochial for a sec…
    The figures for Hove.

    The swing away from Labout went almost entirely to the Lib Dems.

  169. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:46 Permalink | Reply

    Lepper was anti-war, thoguh. He was never seriously in doubt was he?

  170. ingerland on 06.05.2005 at 02:46 Permalink | Reply

    Looks like the Greens really split the vote in Brighton Pavilion, great result for them (22%). Pleased for them but shame it’s let Lepper back in…

  171. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:47 Permalink | Reply

    Two things I always remember about Enfield and ‘Portillo night’.

    1. Portillto lost

    2. He took his licks with remarkavle good grace - far better than Twigg has taken it tonight.

    I think that was we’re Portillo started to re-invent himself as a human being.

  172. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:48 Permalink | Reply

    Reg Keys on the BBC, now.

  173. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:49 Permalink | Reply

    Cheers Ingerland - that’s a big swing away from Labour.

  174. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:49 Permalink | Reply

    Reg Keys on BBC1

  175. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:50 Permalink | Reply

    Get BBC1 on - Blair looks sick - Reg Keys speaking

  176. ingerland on 06.05.2005 at 02:50 Permalink | Reply

    Wow, the look on Tony’s face says it all.

  177. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:50 Permalink | Reply

    Reg Keys: What a speech. And what a blank face from Tone.

  178. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:51 Permalink | Reply

    This post has been removed by the author.

  179. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:52 Permalink | Reply

    Will: The Greens were tipped to take Pavilion. It was supposed to be their first parliamentary seat.

  180. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:52 Permalink | Reply

    But it was never realistic, Justin.

  181. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 02:52 Permalink | Reply

    Not THE Kilroy unfortunately.

  182. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:53 Permalink | Reply

    Reg Key’s - brilliant, brilliant man.

    Blair blew a chance there - he should have tapped Keys on the shoulder and offered him an apology on the spot.

    Gill gone in Leicester South, BTW - looks to have deserved it as he’s done next to nugger all since winning the By-election.

  183. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 02:54 Permalink | Reply

    What did Reg keys say? My sound card’s buggered.

  184. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:55 Permalink | Reply

    I agree, unity. The BBC did well to go back to that speech, because that was the real career killer tonight for Tony, and the papers will pick up on it.

  185. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:55 Permalink | Reply

    Richard Taylor back in at Wyre Forest despite missing the division on Foundation Hospitals which was the only thing he ever promised to bloody vote on.

  186. Will on 06.05.2005 at 02:56 Permalink | Reply

    He said, very simply, that his son died in an illegal war for which Tony Blair has refused to apologise. And he said he’s still waiting for the day.

  187. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 02:58 Permalink | Reply

    Keys made Blair look a very small man - a very small man indeed.

  188. CuriousHamster on 06.05.2005 at 02:58 Permalink | Reply

    And he said 88 British soldiers had died, something not everyone was able to remember. A powerful moment all round.

  189. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 02:59 Permalink | Reply

    Bloody noses all around basically?

    Someone said, about question time last week, that the reason Blair is so easy to get het up is because he has a hard time understand why anyone could possibly disagree with him (was it you Justin? Can’t remember…) and this was why he altered and spun, to make sure people saw things his way.

    You almost pity the poor man, the shaken faith. The self-doubt that now assails him. Well. Almost.

  190. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 03:00 Permalink | Reply

    I think the Keys speech may be the Portillo moment of this election. I wish I’d had the video running. I could watch Blair’s face while Reg was speaking for ever.

  191. Will on 06.05.2005 at 03:02 Permalink | Reply

    Am I right in assuming that the Keys moment is the televisual moment of the night? Anybody looking at other channels?

  192. Will on 06.05.2005 at 03:04 Permalink | Reply

    On the shallow - what is Cherie wearing?

  193. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 03:06 Permalink | Reply

    Is it me or are the Blairs strangers to dignity?

  194. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 03:06 Permalink | Reply

    With any luck the Beeb might put it up as a video clip.

    If they stream it I’ve got software to rip real media and asf streams down to quicktime, windows media and divX and I’ll arrange a d/l sight for it.

    It’s one of the two difining moments of the night, along with Milburn bailing out of the cabinet which amounts to conceding that Brown will be the next leader.

    Guildford’s up.

  195. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 03:07 Permalink | Reply

    Oh shit - the Julian Clary clone in Guildford won - Tim Ireland will be pissed off

  196. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 03:08 Permalink | Reply

    Unity: If you get the video of the speech give me a shout - I’d love to post it here.

  197. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 03:09 Permalink | Reply

    Ah shit. Poor Tim.

  198. Drat on 06.05.2005 at 03:12 Permalink | Reply

    Reg keys interview on ITV.

  199. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 03:14 Permalink | Reply

    “strangers to dignity” *snicker*
    They’re a bit like political Posh and Becks really.

  200. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 03:15 Permalink | Reply

    Blair speaking on BBC1

  201. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 03:17 Permalink | Reply

    “Historic third Labour victory”?

    Tell that to all the ex-MPs looking for new jobs because of Blair’s hubris.

  202. Ken on 06.05.2005 at 03:19 Permalink | Reply

    Well, didn’t Blair look uncomfortable during Keys speech. What a shame the Tory was too arrogant to stand down and give him a real run at the seat.

  203. Will on 06.05.2005 at 03:19 Permalink | Reply

    Well, it is historic.. but

    We are the hollow men
    We are the stuffed men
    Leaning together
    Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
    Our dried voices, when
    We whisper together
    Are quiet and meaningless

  204. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 03:19 Permalink | Reply

    Blair: “very, very proud of what we have done”.

    Proud? He’s got a body count to rival a Schwarzaneggar movie.

  205. Unity on 06.05.2005 at 03:20 Permalink | Reply

    Letwin hung on in Dorset West - another increased majority but not by much.

  206. ingerland on 06.05.2005 at 03:21 Permalink | Reply

    I’ve been checking the Guardian election blog, and it doesn’t exactly seem to be buzzing. Regular posts, but the comments aren’t insightful and don’t go anywhere.

    Much more impressed with this blog - glad I found it a couple of days ago, wish I had earlier.

  207. Katie on 06.05.2005 at 03:22 Permalink | Reply

    Quick process question, I know all the parties have different leader election policies, in amount of weight they put on general members versus PLP, what’s Labour’s?

  208. ingerland on 06.05.2005 at 03:23 Permalink | Reply

    Wow, an overall majority with just 36% of the vote? I must say, that should be a spur to electoral reform, in my opinion. Maybe even the Tories will see the sense in change now.

  209. Justin on 06.05.2005 at 03:25 Permalink | Reply

    Ingerland: You’re too kind. The Guardian are latecomers to blogging and don’t really get it.

    They’ve flown in Kos of Daily Kos fame to cover the election. He may be hot stuff in the States but he’s a fish out of water over here and it’s shown. I’ve been lacking insight tonight largely due to alcohol - what’s b