Pies make you live longer says pie-maker
Reuters: London blasts seen boosting passenger screening
“The mass screening of people on the Tube is something that is clearly going to have to be addressed,” Neil Fisher, director of security solutions at high-tech UK firm QinetiQ, told Reuters.
“We have technology now that can address quite a bit of it,” he said.
They certainly do.
Qinetiq: Passenger Security Scanning
Our Passive Millimetre Wave Scanner offers walk-through security scanning. The scanner can detect concealed metals and ceramics. Up to 6 people a minute can be scanned, eliminating time-consuming metal detectors as well as several security guards.
Mixed messages from QiniteQ though:
The Register: Could the ’see through clothes’ scanner stop London terror bombs?
A report last week claiming that QinetiQ’s ’see-through clothes’ scanner is to be be deployed on London’s underground system has been denied by both QinetiQ and Transport for London.
…
Although the original Times article sensationalises the story by suggesting QinetiQ’s millimetre wave imagers could be deployed across the whole of London underground at a cost of, ahem, £150,000 to £2 million per station, at a total of 270 stations, the core of the story appears to be confirmed by the denial, which concedes that QinetiQ has supplied unspecified “equipment” to TfL. Obviously, if TfL is looking at millimetre wave technology, it must be considering where it could be applied.
It should also be noted that Her Majesty’s Government own 56% of QinetiQ (another 31% is owned by war profiteers The Carlyle Group). The company is expected to be floated on the stock exchange soon at a price of arounf £1bn. A nice juicy contract for millimetre wave imagers for Transport for London wouldn’t hurt.
Posted on July 11th, 2005 at 4:07 pm
| See also • All in the eye of the shareholder • Times: Met suppress files that tell full shooting story • Curiouser |
• Permalink • Trackback • Subscribe |
|
• Filed under Uncategorized |
• |

And it would only be effective if every single station had it. The nature of the Tube is that you can get pretty much anywhere from anywhere, so it would be no good scanning everyone boarding at Westminster but letting any old terrorist on in Perivale.
Up to 6 people per minute - 10 seconds each. Given that big stations might have at least 5 or 6 gates with someone going through about every 2 seconds at peak times, for the same throughput they would need 20-30 scanners. Back of envelope figures, but you get the idea. Also how many false alarms, and how long would it take to deal with one.
Doesn’t sound very practical to me.