Lickspittle hack talks cack

Kitty Ussher: Blood on their hands
Let’s be clear about this: this country is a less safe place because of the actions of the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats and, yes, a minority of our own side, last Wednesday. I very much hope that we will never have another terrorist atrocity in Britain. But if we do, and if it happens because the police have not had sufficient time to accumulate enough evidence to charge the perpetrators, then the Tories, the Lib Dems and our own rebels will have blood on their hands.

Ah, the rivers of blood moment. It seems somebody should be having a word with this water-headed harpy about moral agency. Not being the parliamentarian (New Labour to her very core it would seem), she should have plenty of time to read up on such matters.

Or do New Labour get to pick and choose the reasons for terrorist outrages? No, it’s not our fault. Yes, it is your fault. We could never do anything that would bring carnage to the streets of Britain. Whereas you

(Nosemonkey and Unity say it better than I can.)


Posted on November 15th, 2005 at 9:26 am

See also
Stale bruschetta
Even Stevens
The Times: Order to kill was ‘never given’
   
Permalink
Trackback

Subscribe By Email
Print This Post


Filed under Uncategorized
 

3 Comments

  1. Ken on 15.11.2005 at 12:51 Permalink | Reply

    What gets me is the way she argues that the Tories and the Lib Dems voted for Britain to be a more dangerous place. Actually, they didn’t - if more time actually does make Britain safer, then its twice as safe as it was last Wednesday. Omitting things doesn’t mean you change the status quo for the worse…

  2. World Weary Detective on 17.11.2005 at 17:44 Permalink | Reply

    The desire to lock up people for three months without charge is against the fundamental human standards our society is based on. Perceived injustice breeds new terrorists.

  3. bismarcktheherring on 18.11.2005 at 21:54 Permalink | Reply

    Kitty Ussher, as in Fall of the Housse of Usher, addressed the Burnley May Day Rally, May 2004, as prospective Parliamentary Candidate, and wowed the crowd by suggesting that the march be broadened to include “the private sector”, suggesting that firms like “Marks and Spencers” (which does not recognise unions) should be invited to make a display as well as the traditonal trade union banners. Of course, Ms Ussher didn’t make such a suggestion during the selection procedures relying heavily on the more traditional approaches of seeking nominations from Amicus and other Old Labour unions.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.