Boston Globe: Bush Could Bypass New Torture Ban

WASHINGTON - When President Bush last week signed the bill outlawing the torture of detainees, he quietly reserved the right to bypass the law under his powers as commander in chief.

After approving the bill last Friday, Bush issued a ‘’signing statement” — an official document in which a president lays out his interpretation of a new law — declaring that he will view the interrogation limits in the context of his broader powers to protect national security. This means Bush believes he can waive the restrictions, the White House and legal specialists said.

more…


Posted on January 5th, 2006 at 8:32 am

See also
Compare and Contrast
US Newswire: 540,000 Petitions Delivered to President Bush Demanding Truth About Iraq War; Downing Street Memos Trigger Public Outrage Over Deception
Suffer the Little Children
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Chicken Nuggets, T.W.A.T., US Politics
 

2 Comments

  1. KathyF on 05.01.2006 at 20:17 Permalink | Reply

    Bush has officially stated he can do whatever he wants to, including appointing recess appointments the Senate would never approve.

    Treaties and constitutions haven’t stopped him yet, so why would you think laws recently signed would?

  2. Anonymous on 09.01.2006 at 11:44 Permalink | Reply

    Bush is doing what he wants, including removing the Gitmo detainees right to habeas corpus.
    The right to go before the US courts is their only recourse when he gets his militia boys to torture them repeatedly, lately with unacceptable (in medical, as well as ethical, moral and legal terms) use of overlarge force-feeding tubes.
    He attached it as an ammendment to another bill. The Observer said yesterday:

    This and other Guantánamo lawsuits now face extinction. Last week, President Bush signed into law a measure removing detainees’ right to file habeas corpus petitions in the US federal courts. On Friday, the administration asked the Supreme Court to make this retroactive, so nullifying about 220 cases in which prisoners have contested the basis of their detention and the legality of pending trials by military commission.

    Handy eh?

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.