Peter Preston: A semantic deportation
Elizabeth is cause celebre far away from Fleet Street – in a Manchester community that cares about her survival and utterly believes in her plight. She’s a Ugandan who fled to Britain in 2004 after escaping from a semi-official “safe house” where she’d been held for five months and repeatedly raped and beaten. Was she a common criminal, then? No, she was a lesbian, snatched away from an underground club. She feared for her life: she asked for shelter.
Her Manchester solicitors, her doctors and support organisations have played by the rules ever since she arrived. They’ve ploughed up and down the asylum process, making a case, entering appeals. But there’s a bizarre snag, which the adjudication in the case makes painfully clear. Home Office adjudicators recognise that homosexuals can be persecuted in Uganda – but they don’t accept that the word “homosexual” covers lesbians, too. And because Elizabeth had a child when she was very young, they scratch their heads over whether she’s a lesbian at all.
read the rest…
Posted on June 1st, 2006 at 12:03pm under Chicken Nuggets, Evil of banality, UK politics
| Related posts... • Independent: Another true story of our asylum policy • your good deed for the decade • Offski |
• Permalink • Trackback • Subscribe |
|
|
|
• 2 Comments |

“…they don’t accept that the word “homosexual†covers lesbians..”
I blame the decline of the classical eucation. They probably think the ‘homo’ bit means ‘man’. I wonder what they think ‘hetero’ means.
Uganda is a democracy. Freedom reigns; ship her back via KLM via the Hueston Manisfesto.