Peter Preston: A semantic deportation

Elizabeth is cause celebre far away from Fleet Street - in a Manchester community that cares about her survival and utterly believes in her plight. She’s a Ugandan who fled to Britain in 2004 after escaping from a semi-official “safe house” where she’d been held for five months and repeatedly raped and beaten. Was she a common criminal, then? No, she was a lesbian, snatched away from an underground club. She feared for her life: she asked for shelter.
Her Manchester solicitors, her doctors and support organisations have played by the rules ever since she arrived. They’ve ploughed up and down the asylum process, making a case, entering appeals. But there’s a bizarre snag, which the adjudication in the case makes painfully clear. Home Office adjudicators recognise that homosexuals can be persecuted in Uganda - but they don’t accept that the word “homosexual” covers lesbians, too. And because Elizabeth had a child when she was very young, they scratch their heads over whether she’s a lesbian at all.

read the rest


Posted on June 1st, 2006 at 12:03 pm

See also
Independent: Another true story of our asylum policy
your good deed for the decade
Offski
   
Permalink
Trackback

Subscribe By Email
Print This Post


Filed under Chicken Nuggets, Evil of banality, UK politics
 

2 Comments

  1. Pete in Dunbar (3 comments.) on 01.06.2006 at 18:17 Permalink | Reply

    “…they don’t accept that the word “homosexual” covers lesbians..”

    I blame the decline of the classical eucation. They probably think the ‘homo’ bit means ‘man’. I wonder what they think ‘hetero’ means.

  2. Friendly Fire (32 comments.) on 01.06.2006 at 21:32 Permalink | Reply

    Uganda is a democracy. Freedom reigns; ship her back via KLM via the Hueston Manisfesto.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.