Children: The cause of and solution to all of life’s problems
This year’s unofficial ‘Won’t Somebody Please Think Of The Children’ week was a huge success. First up, on Sunday, the News of the World and the Home Office agreed that Britain is better off with its ‘child sex beasts’ out of sight and out of mind, instead of in plain sight where we can see what they’re up to. Under orders from Britain’s biggest selling newspaper, the Home Secretary ordered 60 of said beasts to be moved from 11 hostels adjacent to schools. Fortunately for the safety of our children, the child abuser is a naturally stupid creature and is unable to drive a car.
Next up was Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor, leader of Britain’s four million Roman Catholics, calling for the 24-week upper limit on abortions to be lowered. It was brave of the Cardinal to thrust himself into the news while Paedomania is sweeping the nation once more. You have to say he timed his run to perfection in a week where child abusers are being moved on to who knows where, him being something of an expert at moving paedophiles on himself. In 1985, while Bishop of Arundel and Brighton, he transferred a known paedophile, Father Michael Hill, to a parish despite advice that Hill would continue to assault children. This Hill did, including altar boys and a child with learning difficulties. He was jailed in 1997 after pleading guilty to nine charges of indecent assault.
So the Cardinal popping up again this week to renew his credentials as champion of the unborn brought to mind the line from American comedian George Carlin when describing the attitudes of US pro-lifers: ‘If you’re pre-born, you’re fine. If you’re pre-school, you’re fucked!’ You don’t have to be a foster carer beating your head against a welfare system staffed by (not exclusively, we’ll admit) lazy, demotivated, incompetent and/or uncaring social workers to know that there are already an awful lot of children out there not being looked after properly before you start throwing might-be-children into the mix. The name Victoria Climbie ring a bell? To quote another US comedian, this time the missed more than ever Bill Hicks: ‘If you’re so pro-life and you’re so pro-child, then adopt one that’s already here, that’s very unwanted and very alone and needs someone to take care of it to get it out of a horrible situation.’
The Catholic Church regards abortion as ‘gravely immoral’ and the late Pope John Paul II said the ‘deliberate decision to deprive an innocent human being of his life is always morally evil and can never be licit either as an end in itself or as a means to a good end’. That’s no abortion, full stop. Sorry, rape victims. In that respect, the Cardinal’s campaign for a lowering of the 24-week limit on abortion is, well, a bloody trick. He knows he can’t get abortion banned completely so he’s hitched his truck to the ‘medical advances means foetuses are viable at 24 weeks’ bandwagon in an attempt to abolish it a slice at a time. If the Cardinal truly wants the ‘open debate’ that he called for this week, then he should pay us the compliment of being open.
The fact that this is a religious leader trying to force his own doctrine on the whole population, Jew, Muslim, Anglican and Atheist, makes it doubly galling. He can try and control what Catholics do with their bodies (and good luck with that, Cormac) but just what arrogant jurisdiction he thinks he has over the rest of us only he can say. The Cardinal spoke of a ‘moral awakening’ that might ‘take birth’ on the issue of abortion as if the British public has been sleepwalking, coat hangers in their hands, through a Somme of aborted foetuses since the passing of the Abortion Act in 1967.
So, it goes without saying that abortion is an emotive subject on both sides. So emotive in fact that some pro-lifers in America see no moral contradiction in killing abortionists who they regard as child killers. All this talk - thanks to advances in ultrasound scanning techniques - of foetuses ‘walking in the womb’, smiling and yawning adds nothing but more emotional blackmail to an already volatile argument. For some mysterious reason babies lose the ability to walk the minute they’re born and don’t remember how to do it again until around a year later. And small babies smile involuntarily when they have wind, not because they’ve just remembered an amusing anecdote they heard at the golf club.
The issue of late abortion needs to be looked at with some sense of perspective. According to the Office of National Statistics, of the 185,000 abortions carried out in the UK in 2004, 124 were at 24 weeks. For all the moral panic (yes, another one), late abortions have yet to catch on as a lifestyle choice for the too-posh-to-push set. As Melissa Dear of the Family Planning Association told the BBC, there are good reasons for these abortions: ‘There may be genetic abnormalities or the women may be just before menopause or in their teens when periods are irregular and they may not have realised they were pregnant.’ Some of these foetuses may be viable and may survive outside the womb. Of those, however, only 39 per cent survive and many of those suffer long term health problems.
To risk sounding puritanical, there is another way of approaching the issue, one that allows everyone (except for possibly the good Cardinal, his colleagues and other self-appointed guardians of the public’s moral wellbeing) to keep their tempers. Put bluntly, there wouldn’t be so many abortions if so many women weren’t getting knocked-up by accident. Easier access to contraception (sorry, Cormac) and information would be a start. An Ofsted study conducted last year found that many schools offered no sex or relationship education (which must, in fact, be provided by law) and many of those who did offered a ‘fragmented’ curriculum.
We live in a society sexualised as never before (’Every moan is real,’ boasted hardcore pornstar Tera Patrick from the cover of one of the lad mags the other week). A healthier, more mature attitude to sex is long overdue in this country. But without providing young people with the emotional equipment to deal with this strange and exciting new landscape, is it any wonder some of them get into trouble? (Rocketing sexual infection rates is another indicator.) You wouldn’t hand someone the keys to your car if they didn’t know how to drive it, but the youth of today are sticking their keys in each other’s ignitions without any real idea of what might be around the corner. Now really, seriously, won’t somebody please just think of the fucking children?
(First published in this week’s The Friday Thing. As much as I’d like to, I can’t claim credit for that final gag. And that really burns.)
Posted on June 23rd, 2006 at 1:09 pm
| See also • Abortion debate just started • Abortion again • Twitter daily digest for 2008-03-23 |
Permalink • Trackback • Subscribe By Email • Print This Post • • • |
|
Filed under Off Yoghurt, The Friday Thing, The coming apocalypse |

I once tried to argue against an anti-abortionist who made major play on images of foetuses and their resemblance to independently living babies by pointing out that many modern dolls are just as ‘babylike’ when viewed under untrasound, and that an argument of resemblance alone was a very bad argument indeed.
‘The Cardinal spoke of a ‘moral awakening’ that might ‘take birth’ on the issue of abortion as if the British public has been sleepwalking, coat hangers in their hands, through a Somme of aborted foetuses since the passing of the Abortion Act in 1967….’
Fabulous; absolutely virtuoso blogging, Justin. I cannot say any more than that.
*throws flowers*
Very nice, Justin.
Further to this, the peripheral nervous system in babies is not fully developed until some time after birth (which is why they cannot walk, etc.); the soft palette has not yet receded (which is why they cannot talk (and why monkeys never can)). Although all babies have the potential to become fully-fledged human beings, they are not so at birth, or even for a few years afterwards.
As for the sex education thing, well, I have written about the Scottish implementation before, i.e. you have to teach the kiddies about sex, but you are not allowed to teach them about contraception (you have to direct them to their parents)…
Insane.
DK
How about having this abortion debate using the oft-maligned New Labour-patented “leading” questionaire,?
1) Do you think the age limit for abortions should be lowered, thanks to watching that great TV programme recently that showed 12 week old foetuses masterbating, walking and giggling in the womb? Y/N
2) Do you think Eastenders Bianca, who had a late (24 week?) abortion several years ago, on receiving the news her baby was going to die and had zero chance of life outside the womb, should have been able in law to go through the mind-blowingly traumatic experience of a full, 12 hour labour and vaginal birth having been given drugs to end the pregnancy early in the caring environment of a labour ward (!!!!!), surrounded by understanding midwives, who were on hand to help her make sense of the experience and the couples profound sense of loss?
3) Or should she have should have been made to wait until the baby she was carrying simply died in there of natural causes in the very late stage of the pregnancy, as it was manifestly un-viable and very seriously geneitically disabled. This baby was going to die however hard everyone wanted it not to be so (it did not have a brain, if I remember right). Only then to go through the process of labour and vaginal birth, which is ovbiously a more physically and psychologically traumatic process for the pregnant woman. Y/N
What would the public say then?
Let’s face it, life is manifestly unfair at times to put parents-to-be through this dilemma. Technology is not perfect, nor do differing technologies advance at the same speed. Nor are they funded equally.
The technology that allows us to watch a foetus the size of my little finger thumbnail playing with itself on TV, is great. It allows an insight into the wonder of the development of human life that was previously unknown.
What this technology cannot change is that with the growing foetus, all the heart-warming images in the word (assuming in this instance this is avaiable in your local NHS grimefest hospital) cannot alter the fact that for many chromasomal and congenital problems testing can only be done once the pregnancy is in the latter stages of development. Technology cannot change that, the baby has to grow for doctors to see if it is developing properly - they cannot just look into a crystal ball and guess at an earlier stage. And so late abortions are rarely a choice, but a necessity. The teenager/menopausal woman paradigm is less often the case, but unviable, seriously disabled and horrifically malformed babies are.
It must be further considered, at a time when maternity services are being slashed thanks to NHS overspend (including that Hewitt promise all women will now get the birthing of their choice), later abortions are in the same queue for the few midwives available. Some midwives choose not to be involved in this traumatic experience, further reducing the available resources. which delays the timing of a late abortion. With more midwives available for all women in labour, maybe the number who have abortions at 24 weeks would drop. Until the services improve, women in all stages of pregnancy will have to wait up to a month for an abortion, hhowever pressing the need.
Allowing this is not giving abortion on demand. It is simply reducing the time between agreeing with doctors to terminate the pregnancy, and an act, rarely if ever taken lightly by the woman involved.
As an aside, I took two friends to have pre-12 week abortions, to hold their hands in the late 80s/early 90s, last time this issue had been pushed into the media so vehemently by the Catholic brigade. Both young women, about to go to university, were terrified, an emotion that was made so much worse by that paragon of Christian love, the now Lord Alton, ex Lib Dem MP. His cronies picketted the clinic in Liverpool, holding the placcards with dismembered babies, screaming at every woman who entered or left the building, branding them a murderer. It was a disgrace, spreading hatred and fear of attack. It made the raw hatred of the Mohammed cartoon/Islamist/Suicide bomber march look amateur.
It feels like it is going to happen all over again, with a special dispensation from New Labour Catholics that this kind of behaviour is OK, and somehow not in the same league of terrorist behaviour as the Animal Liberation lot stealing Granny’s bones or pouring paint stripper on guinea pig breaders’ cars.