Arc of the Convenient

Tony Blair’s very pleased with his shiny new ‘arc of extremism’, isn’t he? After testing it at the G8 summit in July he used the conflation of Iran, Syria and Hezbollah no fewer than three times in the speech he gave in Los Angeles this week.

Something was clearly needed to replace the ‘axis of evil’, Iraq having left the group with nervous exhaustion and not being due to rejoin for the reunion tour until its second breakdown has really taken hold. The ‘axis of evil’ rolls off the tongue, the ‘axis’ part summoning images of the World War II’s Axis powers of Germany, Japan and Italy. The ‘evil’ part metaphorically dresses Iranians, North Koreans and Iraqis in stormtrooper uniforms making it morally easier to shoot, cluster bomb and waterboard them.

The ‘arc of extremism’ is an altogether more contrived outfit, a bit like The Monkees being the US’s answer to the Beatles. The band’s name belies the fussy pedantry evident in much of New Labour’s thinking and language. But Blair loves a clever label, even one as unmemorable as this. The simple, literal approach of ‘Four Poofs and a Piano’ is not for the likes of him.

But it confers almost nothing to the mind in terms of mental imagery. Pause for a minute and try to picture an ‘arc of extremism’.

No, us neither.

It makes you wonder just what names got discarded in the obviously-nothing-better-to-do brainstorming session that came up with it. It’s hard to think of anything worse. The ‘cat’s cradle of calamity?’ ‘Trellis of terror?’ ‘Minestrone of mayhem?’

In the same speech, on the subject of the ongoing unpleasantness in Lebanon, Blair said: ‘We will continue to do all we can to halt the hostilities’. Or at least all that can be done from beside Cliff Richard’s swimming pool in the Bahamas. Has nobody told him they have sun and duty free shops in Tel Aviv and Beirut? (At least, we’re assuming Beirut still has them - the Israeli airforce bombed the city’s Rafik Hariri International Airport back in July.)

The struggle against Hezbollah and global terrorism in general, says Blair, ‘is about hearts and minds about inspiring people, persuading them, showing them what our values at their best stand for’. The thing is, as Rory Bremner once memorably said, it’s hard to win people’s hearts and minds ‘when you leave their hearts in one place and their minds in another’.

It all boils down to ‘a struggle between what I will call Reactionary Islam and Moderate, Mainstream Islam,’ said Blair, as if cluster bombs are able to distinguish between Muslims of either flavour. In case he hadn’t noticed - apart from Israel - the Middle East has had a moderate, mainstream, democratic and secular (albeit with a significant Muslim population) state for a little while now. It has a ’sophisticated, educated, cosmopolitan’ people, according to journalist Robert Fisk who’s lived there for 30 years. It’s called Lebanon and it’s currently being bombed to shit.

How to sort the reactionary from the moderate in the 750,000 displaced people currently on the move in Southern Lebanon? Tony doesn’t say. Of those who weren’t members of the ‘arc of extremism’ before this all started, you can probably now lay good odds that a good number of them will be before it’s all finished. ‘Kill them all and let God sort them out’ - maybe? - as Arnaud-Amaury, the Abbot of Citeaux said back in 1209 when the crusaders asked him how they were to tell Cathar heretics from the Catholics. In that respect, 5,000-lb bombs have a certain 13th Century vibe.

So how to confront Syria and Iran, the Lennon and McCartney of the ‘arc of extremism’? Again, Tony doesn’t say. Asked twice at his last press conference before going on holiday this week, he couldn’t or wouldn’t give an answer. Something to do with modernisation was mentioned. What this is we’re none the wiser. It’s certainly a word to strike fear into the hearts of those back home who’ve been victims of Blair’s programmes of modernisation, be it trying to get a fair answer from the tax credit system, a fair hearing from the immigration system or a fair trial from the anti-terrorist system. Abroad, it’s almost certain to be something even harsher. ‘This is a war, but of a completely unconventional kind,’ said Blair. The weapons that rained down on Iraq looked pretty conventional to us, Tony.

One of the bigger questions to come out of this though is, is Blair *really* the right person to be talking about exporting our ‘values’ abroad, to the dark savages who apparently have none? Either Blair is stupid or he thinks his audience is. We’re talking about a guy who’s helped to level Iraq, who’s up to his neck in a corruption investigation, allows aircraft transporting bunker buster missiles from the US to Israel (and on, a little faster, to Lebanon) to refuel in the UK, and has a money-grabbing wife and a princeling son enjoying the best life has to offer simply because of who his dad is. Most decent-thinking Britons don’t subscribe to those values let alone those swarthy foreigners on who Tony hopes to foist them. (He’s also got a brass neck for talking about extremism, being happy, as he is, to turn a blind eye to creationism being taught in British schools.)

Some people have caught on, however. The United Nations’ deputy secretary general Mark Malloch Brown said that the UK is ‘poorly placed to broker a deal over Lebanon because of their role in bringing about war in Iraq.’ At the UN at least, Tony’s about as welcome as Mel Gibson at a meeting of the Tel Aviv Temperance Society.

Maybe Blair sees himself much like Moses who, having led his people through hardship (or in this case, the ‘elemental struggle about the values that will shape our future’) to the borders of the Promised Land (or the very ‘future of the world’), is prevented from entering it himself, because of his sins, by God.

Which is where all the trouble began, isn’t it? With Blair soon to depart to spend more time with the American lecture circuit, no doubt he’s thinking what Moses should have said to God after his snubbing: ‘Well, at least I won’t have to clear up the mess.’

(First published in this week’s The Friday Thing.)

Update: Garry’s excellent on this.


Posted on August 4th, 2006 at 8:19 am

See also
The giver of life
Not Dead Only Sleeping: The Attorney General’s Advice
Duncan Goodhew gets his priorities straight
   
Permalink
Trackback

Subscribe By Email
Print This Post


Filed under Blair, Off Yoghurt, T.W.A.T., The Friday Thing
 

9 Comments

  1. Sabretache (19 comments.) on 04.08.2006 at 10:50 Permalink | Reply

    Superb stuff! Spot on in all departments. You’ve got the (apology for a) man off to a tee. Particularly enjoyed:

    “It makes you wonder just what names got discarded in the obviously-nothing-better-to-do brainstorming session that came up with it. It’s hard to think of anything worse. The ‘cat’s cradle of calamity?’ ‘Trellis of terror?’ ‘Minestrone of mayhem?’”

    Hilarious if it weren’t so laser accurate.

    He is a total,,, - a total - Jesus I just can’t think of a word that does justice to his complete ghastliness. - and he seems totally oblivious to it all

  2. lambethlad (1 comments.) on 04.08.2006 at 11:03 Permalink | Reply

    When I first heard mention of the ‘arc of extremism’ on Radio 4 at some god-forsaken early hour the other day, I thought it was “ark of extremism”, and the thought flashed through my mind of “the terrorists marched in two-by-two”, and then the ark-full of terrorists being set adrift somewhere very far away, so that they could all either kill each other or else go and colonise Antartica or something, and keep out of everybody else’s way……..Shoah’s Ark rather than Noah’s Ark, in a way.

    So I am now rather disappointed

  3. Simstim (13 comments.) on 04.08.2006 at 11:06 Permalink | Reply

    Hmm… the whole “Arc of Extremism” thing reminds me of the Fertile Crescent. Geographically, however, that includes Israel/Palestine and Egypt, and it also has Islamic connotations, so I can see why he didn’t go for “Crescent of Chaos” (which sounds like a Games Workshop product).

  4. MJ Martin (1 comments.) on 04.08.2006 at 14:35 Permalink | Reply

    Trackback: When Chicken Yoghurt gets it right, it really gets it right…

  5. Devil's Kitchen (18 comments.) on 04.08.2006 at 16:11 Permalink | Reply

    It’s called Lebanon and it’s currently being bombed to shit.

    Hmmm, I believe that Haifa was quite picturesque once too. It’s very easy to be scathing from so far away.

    I could have read this piece in the Guardian, Justin; do you have any solutions to this crisis? Should we invade Israel and… just… bally well make them stop? Or are we looking to the toothless UN to save everyone just like they did in Rwanda and the Balkans?

    DK

  6. Steve G on 04.08.2006 at 16:26 Permalink | Reply

    Frank Furedi discusses this ‘arc’ in The First Post today; he comments:

    ‘We have Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine. Then there is Syria in Syria and Iran in Iran. In the real world they have little in common other than the fact that they present a problem for the West. But an arc can cut across the Shia and Sunni divide and the rivalry between Syria and Iran, and help magnify the problem of “extremism” through endowing it with coherence and purpose. In this way extremism is transformed into a generic threat that intimates planning and conspiracy.

    ‘I have a feeling that Blair’s speech writers have been busy reading Harry Potter books. You will recall that Harry’s nemesis, the evil wizard Lord Voldemort, evokes so much fear that people dare not mention him by name. Consequently they refer to him as “He Who Must Not Be Named” or “You Know Who”.

    ‘No doubt there are very real threats out there that are responsible for causing violence throughout the world. But some politicians are either too confused or too scared to explore the issues in depth and therefore find it difficult to give the problem a name. We cannot expect a Prime Minister to warn us about “You Know What”‘

  7. Justin on 04.08.2006 at 16:30 Permalink | Reply

    I could have read this piece in the Guardian, Justin; do you have any solutions to this crisis?

    Maybe you should bugger off to the Guardian then, DK, you big girl? This was a piece about Blair, his intellectually vacant speech and methods not an alternative roadmap to peace. You might as well have asked why I didn’t also call for the return of Spangles.

  8. Larry Teabag (51 comments.) on 04.08.2006 at 17:41 Permalink | Reply

    Though you’ve undeniably got an amusing turn of phrase Justin, I’ve got to say that your piece is conspicuously lacking in certain departments. I mean, do you have nothing to offer for those of us concerned about the absence of Spangles?

  9. dearieme on 05.08.2006 at 15:34 Permalink | Reply

    Spangle wrappers were particularly effective when you needed to repair the windscreen wipers on a Morris Minor.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.