<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Code breaking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Brighton-based writer Justin McKeating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PooterGeek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; HOW CAN PPL BE SO CRUEL TO BLOGGERS? :-(</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24420</link>
		<dc:creator>PooterGeek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; HOW CAN PPL BE SO CRUEL TO BLOGGERS? :-(</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/#comment-24420</guid>
		<description>[...] Justin of Chicken Yoghurt is wearyingly obtuse in the comments at Never Trust A Hippy. In response to this from Paulie: The prize for the most telling response to the Tim Toulmin /Alistair Campbell dialogue and call for a &#8216;blogger code of conduct&#8217; surely goes to Chicken Yoghurt. His response is that the blogosphere&#8230;. &#8220;&#8230;hasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t yet orchestrated a propaganda offensive (in both senses of the word) that contributed to the deaths of 655,000 people. WhatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s more offensive, a sweary blogger or a Deputy Prime Minister who canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t keep his hands to himself?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Justin of Chicken Yoghurt is wearyingly obtuse in the comments at Never Trust A Hippy. In response to this from Paulie: The prize for the most telling response to the Tim Toulmin /Alistair Campbell dialogue and call for a &#8216;blogger code of conduct&#8217; surely goes to Chicken Yoghurt. His response is that the blogosphere&#8230;. &#8220;&#8230;hasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t yet orchestrated a propaganda offensive (in both senses of the word) that contributed to the deaths of 655,000 people. WhatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s more offensive, a sweary blogger or a Deputy Prime Minister who canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t keep his hands to himself?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apprentice</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24284</link>
		<dc:creator>apprentice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/#comment-24284</guid>
		<description>Oh a voluntary code, a bit like the one the News of the World follows?

Just not sure I&#039;d have the thousands to lob at charity of choice after I&#039;d chosen to ignore it.

Sorry if that&#039;s nasty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh a voluntary code, a bit like the one the News of the World follows?</p>
<p>Just not sure I&#8217;d have the thousands to lob at charity of choice after I&#8217;d chosen to ignore it.</p>
<p>Sorry if that&#8217;s nasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A voluntary code &#171; Not Saussure</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24271</link>
		<dc:creator>A voluntary code &#171; Not Saussure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/#comment-24271</guid>
		<description>[...] Longrider is excellent on the subject, as is Chicken Yoghurt, who is particularly scathing about the ironies inherent in Former Downing Street spin doctor Alastair Campbell&#8217;s view that blogs were &#8220;perceived as a positive development&#8221; but &#8220;some of the most offensive stuff&#8221; comes from them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Longrider is excellent on the subject, as is Chicken Yoghurt, who is particularly scathing about the ironies inherent in Former Downing Street spin doctor Alastair Campbell&#8217;s view that blogs were &#8220;perceived as a positive development&#8221; but &#8220;some of the most offensive stuff&#8221; comes from them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24267</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Fire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/#comment-24267</guid>
		<description>Alistair Campbell, who took &quot;one for the team&quot; in the Butler inquiry still hasn&#039;t gone away, you know. He knows where many nulab&#039;s bodies are buried.

Watch this space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alistair Campbell, who took &#8220;one for the team&#8221; in the Butler inquiry still hasn&#8217;t gone away, you know. He knows where many nulab&#8217;s bodies are buried.</p>
<p>Watch this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james higham</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24266</link>
		<dc:creator>james higham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/#comment-24266</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll be one of the first up against the wall, young man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll be one of the first up against the wall, young man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gracchi</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24265</link>
		<dc:creator>Gracchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/#comment-24265</guid>
		<description>I like the idea that we are all doing the same thing- if I had half the contacts of Guido or the influence of Iain Dale not to mention the economic knowledge of Chris Dillow I&#039;d be a proud man. Some blogs its true can be quite vicious but then again so can parts of the press- and anyway I don&#039;t suppose that Polly Toynbee reads Devil&#039;s Kitchen or Mr Eugenides. Some blogs like Dave Hill&#039;s for instance aren&#039;t vicious. I wouldn&#039;t have thought there is anything much worse than the Sun out there for distortions and innaccuracies- language may be a different matter.

I suspect there is actually more libel problesm from a website like popbitch which moves rumours round the net- I suspect but don&#039;t know. And I&#039;d have thought the celebrity gossip websites are far more vulnerable than your humble political blogger who is most of the time just expressing an opinion.

Just a thought but what&#039;s the status of a comment on a blog- if someone puts it there and says something libellous, if I don&#039;t remove it have I published it and am I an accessory to libel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea that we are all doing the same thing- if I had half the contacts of Guido or the influence of Iain Dale not to mention the economic knowledge of Chris Dillow I&#8217;d be a proud man. Some blogs its true can be quite vicious but then again so can parts of the press- and anyway I don&#8217;t suppose that Polly Toynbee reads Devil&#8217;s Kitchen or Mr Eugenides. Some blogs like Dave Hill&#8217;s for instance aren&#8217;t vicious. I wouldn&#8217;t have thought there is anything much worse than the Sun out there for distortions and innaccuracies- language may be a different matter.</p>
<p>I suspect there is actually more libel problesm from a website like popbitch which moves rumours round the net- I suspect but don&#8217;t know. And I&#8217;d have thought the celebrity gossip websites are far more vulnerable than your humble political blogger who is most of the time just expressing an opinion.</p>
<p>Just a thought but what&#8217;s the status of a comment on a blog- if someone puts it there and says something libellous, if I don&#8217;t remove it have I published it and am I an accessory to libel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24262</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/#comment-24262</guid>
		<description>Damn, I only saw the old pigfucker in the street in Gospel Oak the other day. I was in a car and we were travelling at good speed, so I didn&#039;t spit in his eye.

BTW, I quite like the idea of a millicampbell. Supposedly, a millihelen is the standard unit of beauty on the basis that Helen of Troy was enough to launch a thousand ships, so one ship=millihelen, and one millicampbell is enough mendacity to drive one-thousandth of a scientist to suicide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I only saw the old pigfucker in the street in Gospel Oak the other day. I was in a car and we were travelling at good speed, so I didn&#8217;t spit in his eye.</p>
<p>BTW, I quite like the idea of a millicampbell. Supposedly, a millihelen is the standard unit of beauty on the basis that Helen of Troy was enough to launch a thousand ships, so one ship=millihelen, and one millicampbell is enough mendacity to drive one-thousandth of a scientist to suicide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziz</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24260</link>
		<dc:creator>ziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2006/11/29/code-breaking/#comment-24260</guid>
		<description>7 Mn bloggers ? that&#039;s one in 10(ish) of the population!Sounds a dodgy figure.

Remember &lt;b&gt;Blur&#039;s Terrorism a 12 step program last August 5th&lt;/b&gt;...
&quot;One other point on deportations. Once the new grounds take effect, &lt;b&gt;there will be a list drawn up of specific extremist websites, bookshops, centres, networks and particular organisations of concern.&lt;/b&gt; Active engagement with any of these will be a trigger for the Home Secretary to consider the deportation of any foreign national.&quot;

Matthew Taylor&#039;s remarks should be taken as a wake up call.... legislation to control bloggers probably in the works - most likely in  lock step with the US authorities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7 Mn bloggers ? that&#8217;s one in 10(ish) of the population!Sounds a dodgy figure.</p>
<p>Remember <b>Blur&#8217;s Terrorism a 12 step program last August 5th</b>&#8230;<br />
&#8220;One other point on deportations. Once the new grounds take effect, <b>there will be a list drawn up of specific extremist websites, bookshops, centres, networks and particular organisations of concern.</b> Active engagement with any of these will be a trigger for the Home Secretary to consider the deportation of any foreign national.&#8221;</p>
<p>Matthew Taylor&#8217;s remarks should be taken as a wake up call&#8230;. legislation to control bloggers probably in the works &#8211; most likely in  lock step with the US authorities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
