Comments on: Olbermann on ‘sacrifice’

By: piersy

piersy — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:30:14 +0000

I can’t help thinking that use of terms such as obsolescence, ordnance and ancillary will send Olberman’s rants over the heads of his average viewer.
Ho hum

By: Rick B

Rick B — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:08:43 +0000

Sounds like Keith has been reading-

http://www.amazon.co.uk/War-Racket-Antiwar-Americas-Decorated/dp/0922915865/sr=11-1/qid=1168128049/ref=sr_11_1/203-4503008-2570356

or read it/hear it for free online
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4377.htm

Damn these hippie peacenik highly decorated Marine Major General’s.
And where is the major media figure on TV in this country doing that job? I can’t stand to watch much TV, so maybe I’ve missed it, but is there?

By: ejh

ejh — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:53:13 +0000

I doubt they’ll be doing any walking – or anything slowly. Except thinking, possibly.

By: redpesto

redpesto — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:18:52 +0000

I paraphrase: ‘Does this plan consist of going over the top and walking very slowly towards the enemy machine guns?’ (Blackadder Goes Forth)

By: anon

anon — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:12:22 +0000

Be very afraid. This is the last throw of the dice in a war that is already lost. Bush wiped his ass with the ISG report, and when this surge proves itself to be utterly pointless in spilling gallons of blood, they will up the ante. Bombs over Tehran, of the atomic type.

By: Aenea

Aenea — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:17:53 +0000

It’s very WWI, isn’t it? We shall win by throwing more troops at the enemy ad infinitum.

By: redpesto

redpesto — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:14:13 +0000

"this is not sacrifice...this is human sacrifice" Do you think that Bush has been watching Mel Gibson's Apocalypto (Official site) for ideas?