Comments on: Omerta http://www.chickyog.net/2007/07/18/omerta/ The weblog of Brighton-based writer Justin McKeating Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:03:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Aaron http://www.chickyog.net/2007/07/18/omerta/comment-page-1/#comment-32485 Aaron Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:58:17 +0000 http://www.chickyog.net/2007/07/18/omerta/#comment-32485 Kamm's new(ish) template is foul. I guess you should judge a blog by its cover. Kamm’s new(ish) template is foul.

I guess you should judge a blog by its cover.

]]> By: Flying Rodent http://www.chickyog.net/2007/07/18/omerta/comment-page-1/#comment-32482 Flying Rodent Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:21:15 +0000 http://www.chickyog.net/2007/07/18/omerta/#comment-32482 If only they could all lose, and perhaps be imprisoned together in a deep, dark dungeon far from the public's knowledge or concern. Ah, we can dream... If only they could all lose, and perhaps be imprisoned together in a deep, dark dungeon far from the public’s knowledge or concern.

Ah, we can dream…

]]> By: ejh http://www.chickyog.net/2007/07/18/omerta/comment-page-1/#comment-32479 ejh Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:57:21 +0000 http://www.chickyog.net/2007/07/18/omerta/#comment-32479 I think my favourite part of this whole farce (and there's plenty to choose from) is the way that various parties - including, I think, the two to whom our host has linked - insist that the <i>Telegraph</i> allegations have not been shown in a court to be libellous. They do rather neglect the fact that this is only so <i>because the newspaper accepted in court that they couldn't defend them</i>. Not that this stopped them running an editorial calling their target a "traitor". Nice. I think my favourite part of this whole farce (and there’s plenty to choose from) is the way that various parties – including, I think, the two to whom our host has linked – insist that the Telegraph allegations have not been shown in a court to be libellous. They do rather neglect the fact that this is only so because the newspaper accepted in court that they couldn’t defend them. Not that this stopped them running an editorial calling their target a “traitor”. Nice.

]]> By: Jim Bliss http://www.chickyog.net/2007/07/18/omerta/comment-page-1/#comment-32477 Jim Bliss Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:29:50 +0000 http://www.chickyog.net/2007/07/18/omerta/#comment-32477 Mark Steel's piece in The Independent (<a href="http://comment.independent.co.uk/columnists_m_z/mark_steel/article2779407.ece" rel="nofollow">Why should Galloway be the only fall guy?</a>) is excellent. Mark Steel’s piece in The Independent (Why should Galloway be the only fall guy?) is excellent.

]]>