Good riddance

…to bad rubbish Ike Turner. Boo hoo, rock ‘n’ roll pioneer. Boo hoo, Rocket 88.

You know what? To borrow from Jamie Kenny, writing about another wife-beating arsehole, it meant nothing from the moment Ike first raised his hand to his wife.

Why do famous wife-beaters always get a ‘but’? Sure he hit his missus but did you see him play guitar? Sure he hit his missus but did you see him kick a ball? Sure he hit his missus but…

Tell you what, try this: spend ten minutes talking to someone who’s worked in a women’s refuge and see if these arseholes are still your heroes afterwards.

Fuck the lot of them.


Posted on December 17th, 2007 at 11:20am under Culture, media and sport

Related posts...
MORTON’S FORK 2010: Time for tea and Meet the Wife
Someone’s wife, someone’s daughter
Gordon to conference: come with me if you want to live
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print


 
6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. john b (118 comments.) on 18.12.2007 at 13:07 Permalink | Reply

    Does that apply to all art whose creators also cause misery and suffering, or only wife-beaters’ art?

  2. Justin on 18.12.2007 at 14:25 Permalink | Reply

    Everyone. Time to instigate some zero tolerance, I reckon. I welcome a broad church.

  3. dsquared on 18.12.2007 at 21:48 Permalink | Reply

    It is not as if he was particularly rated at the time, “Rocket 88″ being very much identified retrospectively and not actually being much better than a Chuck Berry filler track in any case. It’s only because of the wife he beat that Ike Turner is even the answer to a pub quiz question, which frankly in my mind raises the spectre that there’s an awful lot of simpering music critics who admire him *because* of what he did, rather than *in spite* of it.

    (also see – Cent, Fifty).

  4. redpesto on 19.12.2007 at 11:11 Permalink | Reply

    If there is a ‘but’, it’s probably because the artistic reputation is established before the criminal one.* (Besides which, I recall Paul Johnson trying a related ad hominem approach to taking down left-wing intellectuals he didn’t like.)

    *Disclaimer: this is, of course, in no way meant to be taken as an endorsement of domestic violence.

  5. Leon (5 comments.) on 19.12.2007 at 11:45 Permalink | Reply

    Fuck the lot of them.

    Well said. Fuck the lot of them over at Harry’s Place.

  6. john b (118 comments.) on 19.12.2007 at 12:01 Permalink | Reply

    Are all Decent Leftists wife-beaters, then?

    I take dsquared’s point – it’s the difference between Eric Gill and the Marquis de Sade. Gill’s stonework and type are admirable in themselves and in spite of his personal life, whereas de Sade appeals only to people who think that raping peasant girls is Groovy and Bohemian.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your e-mail address is never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

RSS feed for comments on this post.