Ooh, you are unlawful

I like this phrase ‘acted unlawfully’. You only really see it used when someone important has been up to something a bit dodgy. Today, it’s Jack Straw who…

…acted unlawfully by failing to provide some prisoners with access to courses to show they were safe for release, appeal judges have ruled.

Why is it never said that [insert cabinet minister] ‘broke the law’? Why did they not say that Harold Shipman ‘acted unlawfully’ when he murdered all those pensioners?

Not that I’m equating Straw’s illegal detention of prisoners with Shipman’s illegal killing of old people, obviously. It’s just that this looks like a soft pedalling of language to me.

Cabinet ministers don’t break the law, they act unlawfully. They’re not punished. They ‘review the judgement’ and ‘consider an appeal’. The implications and consequences of their actions are softened along with the language.

Usually, its only prisoners or asylum seekers (Straw is something of a recidivist) that suffer, so not many people are that bothered. It’ll be interesting to see what happens should Straw ever get around to inflicting himself on a middle class journalist.


Posted on February 1st, 2008 at 6:30am under UK politics

Related posts...
Jack Straw’s apocalypse of interest
BBC News: SFO unlawful in ending BAE probe
See Saw Marjory Straw
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print


 
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Captain Kirkham on 02.02.2008 at 08:34 Permalink | Reply

    It’s lawyer speak. Trust me, I’m a lawyer. The distinction does have meaning. But, and it’s a big but, used in these political circumstances it’s a big fat smoke screen.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your e-mail address is never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

RSS feed for comments on this post.