<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attendance optional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Brighton-based writer Justin McKeating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:38:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ejh</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-38253</link>
		<dc:creator>ejh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/#comment-38253</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s another good one &lt;a&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; regarding Hodge:

&lt;i&gt;Hodge was due to appear on Radio 4&#039;s the World At One yesterday to discuss her speech but &quot;something else came up&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s another good one <a>here</a> regarding Hodge:</p>
<p><i>Hodge was due to appear on Radio 4&#8217;s the World At One yesterday to discuss her speech but &#8220;something else came up&#8221;.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Power</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-38223</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/#comment-38223</guid>
		<description>Watch out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://devilskitchen.me.uk/2008/03/absent-without-leave.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Devil&#039;s &lt;/a&gt;about and I think he likes you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch out the <a href="http://devilskitchen.me.uk/2008/03/absent-without-leave.html">Devil&#8217;s </a>about and I think he likes you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill (Scotland and Spain)</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-38221</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill (Scotland and Spain)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/#comment-38221</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Unfortunately, the opposition&lt;/I&gt;

This sounds rather like you&#039;d blame a woman for being raped because she dresses too provocatively! This government rarely responds straightforwardly to questions in Parliament, however well framed are the questions from either the Official or other Opposition Parties. The fact that they, the government, are now only willing to do radio interviews to attack another Party&#039;s policies, whilst specifically stating they will not defend their own (why, because they&#039;re indefensible?) is just a new low in the depths this government has plumbed in its efforts to stifle democractic accountability. As with everything this Government does, for example the so-called Freedom of Information Act, the detail needs to be examined with forensic care - it loooks good on the surface, as they intend, but means in practice very little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Unfortunately, the opposition</i></p>
<p>This sounds rather like you&#8217;d blame a woman for being raped because she dresses too provocatively! This government rarely responds straightforwardly to questions in Parliament, however well framed are the questions from either the Official or other Opposition Parties. The fact that they, the government, are now only willing to do radio interviews to attack another Party&#8217;s policies, whilst specifically stating they will not defend their own (why, because they&#8217;re indefensible?) is just a new low in the depths this government has plumbed in its efforts to stifle democractic accountability. As with everything this Government does, for example the so-called Freedom of Information Act, the detail needs to be examined with forensic care &#8211; it loooks good on the surface, as they intend, but means in practice very little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris y</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-38220</link>
		<dc:creator>chris y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/#comment-38220</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re supposed to defend their policies in Parliament (remember Parliament?). Unfortunately, the opposition, rather than prepare a series of well briefed questions which would force them to do this, prefer to play silly debating games which make Clinton and Obama look like grown ups by comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re supposed to defend their policies in Parliament (remember Parliament?). Unfortunately, the opposition, rather than prepare a series of well briefed questions which would force them to do this, prefer to play silly debating games which make Clinton and Obama look like grown ups by comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redpesto</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-38218</link>
		<dc:creator>redpesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/#comment-38218</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;We did ask to speak to the Ministry of Justice about how they’re dealing with this problem, but although ministers are giving interviews today about the new Conservative prison policy, we were told they wouldn’t talk about this subject.&lt;/I&gt;

That&#039;s just silly. Normally what happens is that the Minister for Defending the Indefensible (let&#039;s say, Hazel Blears) goes on the programme and attempts to deviate the interview towards attacking the opposition - like Just a Minute from a parallel universe. To admit you&#039;ll only do an interview to behave like an attack dog gives the whole game away. It&#039;s &lt;I&gt;both&lt;/I&gt; cowardice &lt;I&gt;and&lt;/I&gt; contempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We did ask to speak to the Ministry of Justice about how they’re dealing with this problem, but although ministers are giving interviews today about the new Conservative prison policy, we were told they wouldn’t talk about this subject.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s just silly. Normally what happens is that the Minister for Defending the Indefensible (let&#8217;s say, Hazel Blears) goes on the programme and attempts to deviate the interview towards attacking the opposition &#8211; like Just a Minute from a parallel universe. To admit you&#8217;ll only do an interview to behave like an attack dog gives the whole game away. It&#8217;s <i>both</i> cowardice <i>and</i> contempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Unsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-38217</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Unsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/03/attendance-optional/#comment-38217</guid>
		<description>Yes, entertaining isn&#039;t it?  But this is merely a manifestation of the fear and loathing at all levels in Government.  Fear of cross-examination and loathing of scrutiny.

What&#039;s even more entertaining is that the World at One is hardly Torquemada&#039;s chamber.  After all the BBC daily prostrates itself before NuLab&#039;s altar, declaring that it is not worthy - and it ain&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, entertaining isn&#8217;t it?  But this is merely a manifestation of the fear and loathing at all levels in Government.  Fear of cross-examination and loathing of scrutiny.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s even more entertaining is that the World at One is hardly Torquemada&#8217;s chamber.  After all the BBC daily prostrates itself before NuLab&#8217;s altar, declaring that it is not worthy &#8211; and it ain&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
