April 1st: Sorry

So very sorry.

A worried somebody phoned me and ended up calling me a very rude word. Thank you to those lovely, concerned citizens who emailed to make sure I wasn’t being waterboarded. Now, obviously, would be the best time for the authorities to have me disappeared.


Posted on April 1st, 2008 at 1:56pm under A few administrative notices

Related posts...
Own Goal?
When do we invade?
Is the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill back?
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print


 
11 Comments

11 Comments

  1. Friendly Fire on 01.04.2008 at 20:20 Permalink | Reply

    If there is a blog prize for April Fool, you have my vote.

  2. Friendly Fire on 01.04.2008 at 20:59 Permalink | Reply

    As this is April’s fool day, I thought I should share these “real” foolish comments from the Interwebs, in the spirit of it being the “silly day”.

    The Battle for Basra: Britain Should Launch a Troop Surge in Iraq

    Iraqi PM claims Basra ‘success’

    April Fool is the codename for the spy and double agent who allegedly played a key role in the downfall of the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

  3. Rochenko (73 comments.) on 01.04.2008 at 21:45 Permalink | Reply

    That was sweet.

    Hope you took it down before midday, though.

    Rochenko’s last blog post..Peaks and Preferences

  4. Colin Campbell (32 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 01:08 Permalink | Reply

    I laughed, but it did have an air of credibility when I opened it. Very good.

    Colin Campbell’s last blog post..April Fools Wrap Up

  5. Aaron Heath (36 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 09:16 Permalink | Reply

    Excellent.

    I just wish I had seen it. Would I have fell for it???

    Also, that’s my tweet in the screen-grab!

    :o )

    Aaron Heath’s last blog post..are our champions of industry idiots?

  6. Larry Teabag (94 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 15:10 Permalink | Reply

    You mean you haven’t been extraordinarily rendited? Putting the champagne back on ice then.

    Larry Teabag’s last blog post..Feeling a bit dusty?

    1. Justin on 02.04.2008 at 15:18 Permalink | Reply

      Rendited? You made that up, Teabag.

      1. Larry Teabag (94 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 18:46 Permalink | Reply

        [I submitted another comment - did it get eaten?]

        1. Justin on 02.04.2008 at 18:51 Permalink | Reply

          [Nope, the comment moderation is being a bit strict. You're there now.]

  7. Larry Teabag (94 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 18:24 Permalink | Reply

    I just looked it up in my dictionary, and you’re right – there is no “rendited”. The verb seems to be “render”, though this also has the more common verbal noun “rendering”. But what’s (vaguely, if you’re a geek) interesting is that neither “render” nor “rendition” are given the meaning which goes these days with “extraordinary”. So it must be a Pentagon neologism, which I hadn’t realised.

    However “render” does have the meaning “process[ing of] animal byproducts into more useful materials, or more narrowly to the rendering of whole animal fatty tissue into purified fats like lard or tallow”, which is what I meant in this case.

    Larry Teabag’s last blog post..Feeling a bit dusty?

    1. Justin on 02.04.2008 at 18:52 Permalink | Reply

      Hmmmm, fatty tissue.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your e-mail address is never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

RSS feed for comments on this post.