April 1st: Sorry

So very sorry.

A worried somebody phoned me and ended up calling me a very rude word. Thank you to those lovely, concerned citizens who emailed to make sure I wasn’t being waterboarded. Now, obviously, would be the best time for the authorities to have me disappeared.


Posted on April 1st, 2008 at 1:56 pm

See also
Own Goal?
Is the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill back?
We’re all al Qaeda now
   
Permalink
Trackback

Subscribe By Email
Print This Post


Filed under A few administrative notices
 

11 Comments

  1. Friendly Fire on 01.04.2008 at 20:20 Permalink | Reply

    If there is a blog prize for April Fool, you have my vote.

  2. Friendly Fire on 01.04.2008 at 20:59 Permalink | Reply

    As this is April’s fool day, I thought I should share these “real” foolish comments from the Interwebs, in the spirit of it being the “silly day”.

    The Battle for Basra: Britain Should Launch a Troop Surge in Iraq

    Iraqi PM claims Basra ’success’

    April Fool is the codename for the spy and double agent who allegedly played a key role in the downfall of the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

  3. Rochenko (62 comments.) on 01.04.2008 at 21:45 Permalink | Reply

    That was sweet.

    Hope you took it down before midday, though.

    Rochenko’s last blog post..Peaks and Preferences

  4. Colin Campbell (11 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 01:08 Permalink | Reply

    I laughed, but it did have an air of credibility when I opened it. Very good.

    Colin Campbell’s last blog post..April Fools Wrap Up

  5. Aaron Heath (14 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 09:16 Permalink | Reply

    Excellent.

    I just wish I had seen it. Would I have fell for it???

    Also, that’s my tweet in the screen-grab!

    :o)

    Aaron Heath’s last blog post..are our champions of industry idiots?

  6. Larry Teabag (61 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 15:10 Permalink | Reply

    You mean you haven’t been extraordinarily rendited? Putting the champagne back on ice then.

    Larry Teabag’s last blog post..Feeling a bit dusty?

    1. Justin on 02.04.2008 at 15:18 Permalink | Reply

      Rendited? You made that up, Teabag.

      1. Larry Teabag (61 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 18:46 Permalink | Reply

        [I submitted another comment - did it get eaten?]

        1. Justin on 02.04.2008 at 18:51 Permalink | Reply

          [Nope, the comment moderation is being a bit strict. You're there now.]

  7. Larry Teabag (61 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 18:24 Permalink | Reply

    I just looked it up in my dictionary, and you’re right - there is no “rendited”. The verb seems to be “render”, though this also has the more common verbal noun “rendering”. But what’s (vaguely, if you’re a geek) interesting is that neither “render” nor “rendition” are given the meaning which goes these days with “extraordinary”. So it must be a Pentagon neologism, which I hadn’t realised.

    However “render” does have the meaning “process[ing of] animal byproducts into more useful materials, or more narrowly to the rendering of whole animal fatty tissue into purified fats like lard or tallow”, which is what I meant in this case.

    Larry Teabag’s last blog post..Feeling a bit dusty?

    1. Justin on 02.04.2008 at 18:52 Permalink | Reply

      Hmmmm, fatty tissue.

Leave a comment




Warning: stristr() [function.stristr]: Empty delimiter. in /home/chickyog/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wassup/wassup.php on line 2093