Meanwhile, in a parallel universe

A House of Lords committee has reported on the impact of rising numbers of right-wing thinktanks on people’s economic well-being. They found that the benefits of such bodies had been overestimated.

Inquiry chairman Lord Wakeham said: ‘Looking to the future, if you have got that increase in numbers and you haven’t got any economic benefit from it, you have got to ask yourself, is that a wise thing to do?’

Shadow home secretary David Davis said the peers had shown ‘unequivocally that the benefits of the current thinktank policy to ordinary UK citizens are largely non-existent’.


Posted on April 1st, 2008 at 5:31pm under Miscellaneous misanthropy

Related posts...
A local paper for local people
The Sun: the cream of British journalism
One fine day in the middle of the night
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print


 
9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. jameshigham (69 comments.) on 01.04.2008 at 18:27 Permalink | Reply

    Why do they call it thinktank? Do you have to get tanked to think or must you climb into one?

    Puzzled

    jameshigham’s last blog post..[curves] in the eye of the beholder

    1. Justin on 01.04.2008 at 18:32 Permalink | Reply

      I think it’s because they get to lumber across all kinds of terrain, blasting away from a safe distance, and they have thick skins.

  2. ejh (436 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 08:04 Permalink | Reply

    Does anyone else have a Yahoo account and find it really pisses them off to see a Taxpayers’ Alliance* press release in Yahoo News practically every day?

    [* an "alliance" of about six people, as far as I can see]

    ejh’s last blog post..Spain

    1. Justin on 02.04.2008 at 08:12 Permalink | Reply

      We really should start our own outfit – it seems to be a piece of piss to get all kinds of horseshit into the media. The lazy sods will swallow anything.

  3. Letters From A Tory (57 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 08:26 Permalink | Reply

    Oh come off it! If the House of Lords tells us that immigration is failing to achieve what it is supposed to achieve, we’d better start listening.

    http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com

    1. Justin on 02.04.2008 at 08:28 Permalink | Reply

      So what is immigration supposed to achieve?

  4. ejh (436 comments.) on 02.04.2008 at 10:40 Permalink | Reply

    Come to that, what is the House of Lords supposed to achieve?

    ejh’s last blog post..Spain

    1. Justin on 02.04.2008 at 11:15 Permalink | Reply

      Well, surely being something of a bulwark against incipient authoritarianism in recent years deserves a bonus point or two.

  5. Dave Hansell on 03.04.2008 at 14:42 Permalink | Reply

    This report seems to be all over the place. One minute its complaining about a lack of or poor data from which to conduct a meaningful analysis, the next minute its coming to firm conclusions despite the lack of meaningful date it complains about.

    Just goes to show that most politicians – elected or otherwise, couldn’t think their way out of a wet paper bag – especially the tory ones (of whichever flavour – the real ones and the New Labour imitators) as lettersfromatroy aptly demonstrates.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your e-mail address is never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

RSS feed for comments on this post.