Comments on: Links and stuff between June 3rd and June 4th http://www.chickyog.net/2008/06/04/links-and-stuff-between-june-3rd-and-june-4th/ The weblog of Brighton-based writer Justin McKeating Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:40:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: a very public sociologist http://www.chickyog.net/2008/06/04/links-and-stuff-between-june-3rd-and-june-4th/comment-page-1/#comment-39899 a very public sociologist Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:14:34 +0000 http://www.chickyog.net/2008/06/04/links-and-stuff-between-june-3rd-and-june-4th/#comment-39899 It always amazes me when the Mail rails against the BNP - as if their headlines haven't acted as a recruiting sergeant for them and far right ideas generally. One thing the article hasn't mentioned is that the BNP propaganda at the time "overlooked" the fact Keith Brown was one of their activists. Funny that! It always amazes me when the Mail rails against the BNP – as if their headlines haven’t acted as a recruiting sergeant for them and far right ideas generally.

One thing the article hasn’t mentioned is that the BNP propaganda at the time “overlooked” the fact Keith Brown was one of their activists. Funny that!

]]> By: Nick http://www.chickyog.net/2008/06/04/links-and-stuff-between-june-3rd-and-june-4th/comment-page-1/#comment-39891 Nick Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:57:17 +0000 http://www.chickyog.net/2008/06/04/links-and-stuff-between-june-3rd-and-june-4th/#comment-39891 Interesting that significant parts of that Daily Mail story appear to be lifted wholesale from this Guardian article from a few days previously: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/may/28/labour.thefarright The Mail plagiarising the Guardian? Surely some mistake... Maybe they imagine there's not much overlap in the readership? Interesting that significant parts of that Daily Mail story appear to be lifted wholesale from this Guardian article from a few days previously: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/may/28/labour.thefarright

The Mail plagiarising the Guardian? Surely some mistake… Maybe they imagine there’s not much overlap in the readership?

]]>