<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miliband polishes the turds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chickyog.net/2008/08/01/miliband-polishes-the-turds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/08/01/miliband-polishes-the-turds/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Brighton-based writer Justin McKeating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:40:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: redpesto</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/08/01/miliband-polishes-the-turds/comment-page-1/#comment-41220</link>
		<dc:creator>redpesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=2722#comment-41220</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;So what’s David Miliband’s excuse for his incoherent, opaque utterances that need interpreting by flunkies? He ‘wrote’ an article for the Guardian yesterday which has the likes of publicly-funded gossip Nick Robinson (the BBC’s ‘political editor’) breathless with excitement.&lt;/I&gt;

To be honest Justin, the entire political scribbleati have been drooling over this - I had the feeling Michael Crick on Newsnight really wanted Labour to lose Glasgow East because the &#039;story&#039; would keep on rolling, not least because banging on about &#039;Gordon Brown&#039;s leadership&#039; is easier than analysing the ideological and intellectual void at the heart of New Labour that has got them into this mess.

That aside, you&#039;re on the money re. the &#039;content &#039; of Milliband&#039;s article. Put it this way: If Blears or McNulty had written it, would it have been any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So what’s David Miliband’s excuse for his incoherent, opaque utterances that need interpreting by flunkies? He ‘wrote’ an article for the Guardian yesterday which has the likes of publicly-funded gossip Nick Robinson (the BBC’s ‘political editor’) breathless with excitement.</i></p>
<p>To be honest Justin, the entire political scribbleati have been drooling over this &#8211; I had the feeling Michael Crick on Newsnight really wanted Labour to lose Glasgow East because the &#8217;story&#8217; would keep on rolling, not least because banging on about &#8216;Gordon Brown&#8217;s leadership&#8217; is easier than analysing the ideological and intellectual void at the heart of New Labour that has got them into this mess.</p>
<p>That aside, you&#8217;re on the money re. the &#8216;content &#8216; of Milliband&#8217;s article. Put it this way: If Blears or McNulty had written it, would it have been any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
