<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard-headed realism from James Purnell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chickyog.net/2008/10/18/hard-headed-realism-from-james-purnell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/10/18/hard-headed-realism-from-james-purnell/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Brighton-based writer Justin McKeating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:31:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Purnell resigns. Britain shrugs - Chicken Yoghurt</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/10/18/hard-headed-realism-from-james-purnell/comment-page-1/#comment-45553</link>
		<dc:creator>James Purnell resigns. Britain shrugs - Chicken Yoghurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3435#comment-45553</guid>
		<description>[...] I imagine it&#8217;ll be just the Tories upset at his departure, him having been a sleeper agent for them - &#8216;I say old boy, any chance you could be a bit more beastly to the great unwashed?&#8217; &#8216;I. Obey. Master.&#8217; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I imagine it&#8217;ll be just the Tories upset at his departure, him having been a sleeper agent for them &#8211; &#8216;I say old boy, any chance you could be a bit more beastly to the great unwashed?&#8217; &#8216;I. Obey. Master.&#8217; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redpesto</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/10/18/hard-headed-realism-from-james-purnell/comment-page-1/#comment-42300</link>
		<dc:creator>redpesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3435#comment-42300</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that Purnell didn&#039;t suggest lap-dancing, if only because of New Labour&#039;s belief in the service economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that Purnell didn&#8217;t suggest lap-dancing, if only because of New Labour&#8217;s belief in the service economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/10/18/hard-headed-realism-from-james-purnell/comment-page-1/#comment-42298</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3435#comment-42298</guid>
		<description>The driving instructor training industry is a fucking huge con. For every 100 people that attempt to become instructors, only 8 become fully qualified. This is because the training is shit, and deliberately so. You see the ads in the paper each week... Become a driving instructor! Earn £30k a year! Utter bollocks! The likes of the instructor college take £2500-3000 off you, let you work as a trainee for 6 months then you fail your teaching test and the space in their driving school is freed up for some other poor mug. And while your working for that 6 months? Are you going to earn £15000? My arse you will. They will take a couple of hundred quid off you each week in franchise fees and give you just enough work to cover their fees. I now work for myself, after being given a right royal screwing by the AA. I spend most of my time trying to find work. There are already too many instructors competing for the business, without putting thousands more job-seekers into the market. And as peak oil/climate change/etc really starts to bite, who will want to learn to drive?

Don&#039;t get me wrong. It&#039;s a brilliant job if you have the aptitude, but you need to be a salesman far more than you need to be a teacher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The driving instructor training industry is a fucking huge con. For every 100 people that attempt to become instructors, only 8 become fully qualified. This is because the training is shit, and deliberately so. You see the ads in the paper each week&#8230; Become a driving instructor! Earn £30k a year! Utter bollocks! The likes of the instructor college take £2500-3000 off you, let you work as a trainee for 6 months then you fail your teaching test and the space in their driving school is freed up for some other poor mug. And while your working for that 6 months? Are you going to earn £15000? My arse you will. They will take a couple of hundred quid off you each week in franchise fees and give you just enough work to cover their fees. I now work for myself, after being given a right royal screwing by the AA. I spend most of my time trying to find work. There are already too many instructors competing for the business, without putting thousands more job-seekers into the market. And as peak oil/climate change/etc really starts to bite, who will want to learn to drive?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong. It&#8217;s a brilliant job if you have the aptitude, but you need to be a salesman far more than you need to be a teacher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/10/18/hard-headed-realism-from-james-purnell/comment-page-1/#comment-42283</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3435#comment-42283</guid>
		<description>And don&#039;t get me started on this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/3203419/Gordon-Brown-says-unemployed-should-lag-roofs.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;roof-lagging&lt;/a&gt; horseshit either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And don&#8217;t get me started on this <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/3203419/Gordon-Brown-says-unemployed-should-lag-roofs.html">roof-lagging</a> horseshit either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/10/18/hard-headed-realism-from-james-purnell/comment-page-1/#comment-42282</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3435#comment-42282</guid>
		<description>A revolting column from her today. Traditional Toynbee though, innit. Minimum wage, New Deal, comfy jobcentres, tax credits - a huge part of their design is to assuage that particular brand of liberal middle class guilt experienced by those who&#039;ll never have to use them (until now). Whether these initiatives actually function is pretty much an afterthought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A revolting column from her today. Traditional Toynbee though, innit. Minimum wage, New Deal, comfy jobcentres, tax credits &#8211; a huge part of their design is to assuage that particular brand of liberal middle class guilt experienced by those who&#8217;ll never have to use them (until now). Whether these initiatives actually function is pretty much an afterthought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Eugenides</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/10/18/hard-headed-realism-from-james-purnell/comment-page-1/#comment-42281</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Eugenides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3435#comment-42281</guid>
		<description>Despite myself, I smiled at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/18/economy-unemploymentdata&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;, from Polly today:

&lt;i&gt;Gone are the rows of battered plastic chairs bolted down to lino floors, gone the bulletproof screens, the angry queues hours long. Now it&#039;s plush carpets, soft bright armchairs, an appointment system with attentive personal advisers at open desks. Where it took countless separate claims to Revenue &amp; Customs, local council and benefits office, repeating the same story over and over, now everything will be sorted in one interview.&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;Gone are... the angry queues hours long&quot;? &quot;Everything will be sorted in one interview&quot;? 

Nothing like swallowing government Kool-aid in one gulp, is there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite myself, I smiled at <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/18/economy-unemploymentdata">this</a>, from Polly today:</p>
<p><i>Gone are the rows of battered plastic chairs bolted down to lino floors, gone the bulletproof screens, the angry queues hours long. Now it&#8217;s plush carpets, soft bright armchairs, an appointment system with attentive personal advisers at open desks. Where it took countless separate claims to Revenue &amp; Customs, local council and benefits office, repeating the same story over and over, now everything will be sorted in one interview.</i></p>
<p>&#8220;Gone are&#8230; the angry queues hours long&#8221;? &#8220;Everything will be sorted in one interview&#8221;? </p>
<p>Nothing like swallowing government Kool-aid in one gulp, is there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marksany</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/10/18/hard-headed-realism-from-james-purnell/comment-page-1/#comment-42280</link>
		<dc:creator>marksany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3435#comment-42280</guid>
		<description>Telephone sanitisers: the training course for that is quite short. 

OR:

I&#039;ll wash your car, you can wash mine.   I don&#039;t have a car anymore? Shit.

OR:

You paint my house, I&#039;ll paint yours.   I don&#039;t have a house anymore? Bugger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telephone sanitisers: the training course for that is quite short. </p>
<p>OR:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll wash your car, you can wash mine.   I don&#8217;t have a car anymore? Shit.</p>
<p>OR:</p>
<p>You paint my house, I&#8217;ll paint yours.   I don&#8217;t have a house anymore? Bugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
