The careless James Purnell and the question of priorities

What can we deduce and adduce about the character of the work and pensions secretary from the news that he carelessly left confidential correspondence on a train? Not much, I would say. I don’t think there’s any cause for alarm, is there? The correspondence was, after all, only regarding the concerns of another MP’s constituents; those of mere voters. It would, in any case, be wrong to discuss this individual case in the age of governmental abstraction dictated by the demands of business leaders and political sociopathy.

We can, however, be surely safe in the knowledge that, should James Purnell find himself on a train with, say, the first draft of a dossier attempting to justify a war of aggression, or nomination papers for a future Labour leadership bid, or a directive from on high outlining measures required for the expansion of Rupert Murdoch’s business empire, his attitude towards the security of that information will be tighter than his grip on the throats of the undeserving poor.


Posted on November 2nd, 2008 at 12:36pm under New Labour

Related posts...
You’re not spinning any more
New Labour: Slightly less awful than the Tories Part 2
Bill and coup
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print


 
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Peter Rodger on 02.11.2008 at 13:02 Permalink | Reply

    Posted on November 2nd, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    Check your clock, perhaps?

    (It was up before 12:00…)

    1. Justin on 02.11.2008 at 13:38 Permalink | Reply

      Bloody clocks changing. Cheers for the heads-up.

Leave a comment




Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your e-mail address is never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

RSS feed for comments on this post.

The URL to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.chickyog.net/2008/11/02/the-careless-james-purnell-and-the-question-of-priorities/trackback/