<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Labour&#8217;s problem solving: a lesson to us all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chickyog.net/2008/11/11/new-labours-problem-solving-a-lesson-to-us-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/11/11/new-labours-problem-solving-a-lesson-to-us-all/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Brighton-based writer Justin McKeating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:40:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/11/11/new-labours-problem-solving-a-lesson-to-us-all/comment-page-1/#comment-42772</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3654#comment-42772</guid>
		<description>Careful Justin - your reality based description of how this &quot;progressive&quot; (ie. NOT the Tory Party) administration (which was supposed to be different) operates is likely to bring down upon your head accusations of cynicism and carping from the &quot;left&quot; from the usual suspects eagerly competing with each other for the mantle of Squealer (from Orwell&#039;s Animal Farm).

You&#039;ll be telling us next that its wrong to be a hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful Justin &#8211; your reality based description of how this &#8220;progressive&#8221; (ie. NOT the Tory Party) administration (which was supposed to be different) operates is likely to bring down upon your head accusations of cynicism and carping from the &#8220;left&#8221; from the usual suspects eagerly competing with each other for the mantle of Squealer (from Orwell&#8217;s Animal Farm).</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll be telling us next that its wrong to be a hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordo at This is Omar&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/11/11/new-labours-problem-solving-a-lesson-to-us-all/comment-page-1/#comment-42766</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordo at This is Omar&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3654#comment-42766</guid>
		<description>[...] Also &gt; Chicken Yoghurt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also &gt; Chicken Yoghurt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monoi</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/11/11/new-labours-problem-solving-a-lesson-to-us-all/comment-page-1/#comment-42762</link>
		<dc:creator>Monoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3654#comment-42762</guid>
		<description>Whether that was the case with mps or not is a moot point, since 2 wrongs don&#039;t make a right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether that was the case with mps or not is a moot point, since 2 wrongs don&#8217;t make a right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/11/11/new-labours-problem-solving-a-lesson-to-us-all/comment-page-1/#comment-42761</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3654#comment-42761</guid>
		<description>You just know that the threat to the national media will mean that the definition of &#039;national security&#039; becomes ever greater.  That said, leaking details of a live investigation was bloody stupid.

http://www.lettersfromatory.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just know that the threat to the national media will mean that the definition of &#8216;national security&#8217; becomes ever greater.  That said, leaking details of a live investigation was bloody stupid.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lettersfromatory.com">http://www.lettersfromatory.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/11/11/new-labours-problem-solving-a-lesson-to-us-all/comment-page-1/#comment-42760</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3654#comment-42760</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right. Thinking about it, I suppose the timing of the &#039;announcement&#039; about rebellious MPs is the killer. Why now? I think because it helps to show that &lt;i&gt;Gordon&#039;s back and he&#039;s pissed off. He&#039;s not taking any more shit. He knows what&#039;s best. Don&#039;t get in his way&lt;/i&gt;. 

That it serves to reinforce the public perception of MPs as self-serving careerists who are corralled by appealing to their ambitions and wallets rather than their consciences doesn&#039;t seem to have occurred to anyone in the high command.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right. Thinking about it, I suppose the timing of the &#8216;announcement&#8217; about rebellious MPs is the killer. Why now? I think because it helps to show that <i>Gordon&#8217;s back and he&#8217;s pissed off. He&#8217;s not taking any more shit. He knows what&#8217;s best. Don&#8217;t get in his way</i>. </p>
<p>That it serves to reinforce the public perception of MPs as self-serving careerists who are corralled by appealing to their ambitions and wallets rather than their consciences doesn&#8217;t seem to have occurred to anyone in the high command.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejh</title>
		<link>http://www.chickyog.net/2008/11/11/new-labours-problem-solving-a-lesson-to-us-all/comment-page-1/#comment-42759</link>
		<dc:creator>ejh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickyog.net/?p=3654#comment-42759</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;MPs who have voted against the government in the past year will not be recommended for positions on parliamentary committees. &lt;/i&gt;

Just asking, but wouldn&#039;t something similar be normal practice, not something particular to New Labour? Backbenchers who vote against their party don&#039;t usually find favour when it comes to consdieration for promotion. Possibly that&#039;s more accentuated in New Labour than it has been previously, but I wouldn&#039;t say so for sure.

It&#039;s perhaps worth adding that one persistent NL habit when coming under criticism has been to apologise and promise to &quot;listen&quot; in the future. After a while this has roughly the same effect as the manager who tells you that their door is always open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>MPs who have voted against the government in the past year will not be recommended for positions on parliamentary committees. </i></p>
<p>Just asking, but wouldn&#8217;t something similar be normal practice, not something particular to New Labour? Backbenchers who vote against their party don&#8217;t usually find favour when it comes to consdieration for promotion. Possibly that&#8217;s more accentuated in New Labour than it has been previously, but I wouldn&#8217;t say so for sure.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s perhaps worth adding that one persistent NL habit when coming under criticism has been to apologise and promise to &#8220;listen&#8221; in the future. After a while this has roughly the same effect as the manager who tells you that their door is always open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
