CLASH OF THE TITANS: Bloggerheads vs Chicken Yoghurt, Drunk vs Sober

Hello and welcome to tonight’s debate.

Tim Ireland over at Bloggerheads says one must be ultra-cautious when blogging or twittering if one has been drinking…

…why in heaven’s name would you risk getting into a war of words with anyone when in that state, when you put yourself at risk in much the same way that you would in a drunken fistfight?

I say, fair enough when it’s something important, but I’ve had plenty of erudite alcohol-fuelled debates on and off line and come to no harm whatsoever. It’s a world away from jumping in the car and weaving home.

So we’re going to put it to the vote. I reckon I can out-debate Tim after a skinful. He’s going to try to prove me wrong. Tonight, Chicken Yoghurt is going to be fuelled by that fine cerveza Corona Extra. Bloggerheads is going to be fuelled by nothing stronger than Pepsi Max.

The motion we’ll be debating? Who do we judge to be the better Prime Minister, Tony Blair or Gordon Brown? We’ve both got plenty of material to go at it. Feel free to join us.

As I’m hosting this debate/experiment and I decided the topic for discussion, Tim gets to choose which statesman he’d like to bat for and also gets to set out his stall first. Over to Tim…


Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 8:16pm under Blog, bloggers and blogging, New Labour

Related posts...
Like a monkey with a miniature cymbal
The Blair legacy continues to congeal
Just to put your minds at rest
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print


 
90 Comments

90 Comments

  1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 20:27 Permalink | Reply

    You’ll need every advantage you can get, mate. I’ll bat for Tony Blair.

    :o )

    So, you can start by telling me what exactly you think it was that helped Gordon Brown win the last general elec… oh.

    Sorry, mate. Your move. Good luck.

    1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 20:40 Permalink | Reply

      Ok, Admin first…

      Via Twitter, Ian Appleby asks ‘Point of order: has your skin already been filled or are you starting sober? Is young Mr Hague the benchmark for “drunk,” or what?’ Good point. I will give a running total of imbibes.

      Corona Count: 3

      Although he was one of the main figures behind the creation of the New Labour brand, it has to be said that he’s managed very well to avoid to close an association with it. Even his spin doctor, Charlie Whelan, was an avuncular salt-of-the-earth type who could only come off best when compared to Blair’s head-kicker, Campbell.

      Brown kept clear of the Iraq debacle and beyond writing the cheques for it he can’t be held responsible for the clusterfuck left by his predecessor either in term of the mess on the ground or the damage done to trust in British politics.

      And let’s be honest, just his complete lack of Blairite gloss puts him way ahead. His fumbling manner, nervous grin, his just-out-of-bed clothes sense and that thing he does with his mouth. You can’t tell me he’s had any effective media training.

      1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 21:53 Permalink | Reply

        Pepsi Max count: 1

        “avoid to close an association with it”
        “kept clear of the Iraq debacle”

        So your opening statement in favour is… he can duck and hide?

        I will grant you that he managed to avoid the issue up until about 3 days before the 2005 election, when he was forced to swing in behind Blair and express his support for the venture. And he owns it now.

        Also, he’s not as slick as Blair, but if a lack of media training is the only qualification you need to be a good PM, then Paul Staines could walk into No 10 tomorrow.

        1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 21:55 Permalink | Reply

          … *stagger* into No. 10 tomorrow. My bad.

        2. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 22:05 Permalink | Reply

          Hang about, are we just arguing for and against Brown or are you going to grit your teeth and say something nice about Tony?!

          Corona Count: 4 and a bit.

          Right then. Promising to repeal Sections 132 to 138 of Socpa: Brown. Cluster bomb ban: Brown. Tax credits: Brown. Wanting to end child poverty by 2020: Brown. Oveseas aid budget increases: Brown.

          1. Nosemonkey (91 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:15 Permalink | Reply

            And, let’s not forget, the “ZaNu LieBore” meme started when Blair was in office. That’s another -100 to Tony, merely for being in office at the same time as a bunch of halfwit right-wingers libertarians discovered the internet.

            1. Nosemonkey (91 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:17 Permalink | Reply

              My cunning strikethrough disappeared. Curse your lying preview function, McKeating. (And to think, I was on your side…)

            2. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 22:18 Permalink | Reply

              The ‘ZaNu LieBore’ meme keeps hundreds if not thouands of young men distracted from potentially fatal levels of self-abuse. It’s a life-saver if nothing else.

          2. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:17 Permalink | Reply

            You said one greater than the other, comparatively speaking and all, does it matter how we get there?

            :O)

            Speaking of actually getting somewhere:

            Promising to repeal Sections 132 to 138 of Socpa: Brown

            So? I promise to fly to Mars and back. Big deal. I’ll assume you want to drop that one.

            Cluster bomb ban: Brown.

            So we haven’t used any cluster bombs in any of the wars we’ve fought since… oh. I’ll assume you want to drop that one, too, on much the same basis.

            Tax credits: Brown.

            A point for you. Well done.

            Wanting to end child poverty by 2020: Brown.

            Off to Mars again!

            Oveseas aid budget increases: Brown.

            OK, have two points. But only because I’m lazy and ignorant on budget stuff.

            Right back at you for three easy points for me:

            Devolved power to the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly and Northern Ireland.

            Oh, and peace in Northern Ireland. Thought impossible not that long ago. Better make that four points for me, yes?

            1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 22:27 Permalink | Reply

              Ok. Corona Count: 6 (I missed the bottle I had with my tea).

              That’s a bit cheap dismissingt the cluster bomb ban. We’ll have to stick with it if things go south with Iran or (fill in name of nation of brown people here).

              And hark at you and your ‘Brown’s off to Mars’ with his SOCPA repeal. You did a big victory dance and everything at the time.

              Go easy witht he devolution bit. It’s not perfect by any means. Scottish votes for English laws, anybody? Wales, Scotland and NI are on shortish leads. There’s talk of Westminster taking powers back froim Scotland in the SNP digs its heels in and refuses any new nuclear power stations.

              1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:37 Permalink | Reply

                At the time, yes, because at that time, he still had plenty of time to get it through Parliament. SOCPA looks set to be inherited by the Tories, and I’m sure they’ll just rush out to repeal it, what with having no agenda of their own and everything.

                Tell you what; take your point for cluster bombs, and we’ll call it even

                That’s 3 points to you.

                As for devolution, it may be limited or imperfect or whatever, but at least it’s in the present, not in the future. Speaking of which…

                “There’s talk of Westminster taking powers back froim Scotland”

                Oh, there’s *talk*, is there?

                Mars again.

                I note you’re also skipping peace in Northern Ireland.

                So have I got 4 points or are you going to claim it’s only 1, based on what your crystal ball says?

                (Once you give me my 4 points that I deserve, can we start a new threadette? It’s going to get awfully narrow here soon, and as Philip has noticed, I do like my elbow room.)

                1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 22:42 Permalink | Reply

                  Jesus, I didn’t realsie you were going to keep score. Four point sto you if you insist. I’ll start a new thread down below…

                  1. Sim-O (91 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:49 Permalink | Reply

                    Watch those typos Justin, you’re starting to slurr.

                    1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:53 Permalink | Reply

                      Told you so.

                      Ready when you are, Barn*… I mean, Justin:
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXqUhqU7hgM

                      1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 22:56 Permalink | Reply (Comments won't nest below this level)

                        Maybe that’s what I want you to think…

                  2. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:56 Permalink | Reply

                    I didn’t realsie you were going to keep score

                    I’m sure there’s a few things you don;t realsie right now. But how do we know who wins if we don’t keep score?

                    THAT SCORE BEING:

                    TIM – 4
                    JUSTIN – 3

                    1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 23:05 Permalink | Reply

                      4 -3, eh? Not as hopless as you were expecting, am I?

            2. D-Notice (38 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:28 Permalink | Reply

              Re SOCPA

              I don’t think that Brown promised to repeal those sectoins.

              I’m pretty sure he said to just amend it, i.e. lessen the effect.

  2. Nosemonkey (91 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 20:36 Permalink | Reply

    You’re both wrong.

    I WIN!

    (Fuelled by two pints of Old Growler, half a pint of an anonymous free Pilsner, a large scotch, lack of sleep and a public-school education.)

    1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 21:42 Permalink | Reply

      “You’re wrong and I win!”

      Wow, it’s almost like Iain Dale is in the room. Spooky…

      (Heya, Nosemonkey. Nice to have an old hand in attendance.)

      1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 21:44 Permalink | Reply

        Get on with it.

    2. AdamB (4 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:01 Permalink | Reply

      I raise you two glasses of red wine, a grammar school education *and* a chip on the shoulder. Pshaw!

  3. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 20:37 Permalink | Reply

    PS – 8:30? It’s 9:30 by my clock and everyone else’s. The clock on your server is behind the times. Just like a certain PM.

    1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 20:41 Permalink | Reply

      Bugger. Wordpress needs to be manually updated for BST. Hang about…

      1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 21:44 Permalink | Reply

        You’re looking under the hood? Be careful. Alcohol and tools don’t mix.

        1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 21:46 Permalink | Reply

          It’s fixed now. Lager WIN.

          1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 21:58 Permalink | Reply

            I saw you getting too close to the fan belt. Count your fingers.

  4. Philip (244 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 20:40 Permalink | Reply

    Gordon Brown is by far the better Prime Minister, as he is highly unlikely to be in office for ten years.

  5. Pete Connolly (1 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 21:54 Permalink | Reply

    I’ve had a few, so I feel I can join in at random and shout encouragement to all and sundry – preferably whoever is doing the best at whatever point I choose to shout. Also. I may fall asleep randomly then ask to be taken home by whoever wakes me up. Since I love you.

    Thanks

  6. Daniel Hoffmann-Gill (228 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 21:59 Permalink | Reply

    This is great.

    I’ve had two cocktails and a Bailey’s.

    YEAH!

    1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:05 Permalink | Reply

      One drunk at a time, please

    2. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 22:12 Permalink | Reply

      Baileys is always how I imagine Shane MaGowan’s phlegmn to look. And probably taste.

  7. Sim-O (91 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:05 Permalink | Reply

    i gotta stay sober tonight, so if anyone wants’ a lift home later…

    *nurses a Kaliber*

    1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:21 Permalink | Reply

      Kaliber tastes like cat’s piss. Worse than cat’s piss. Cat’s piss is actually quite nice when properly chilled. If you’re to drink non-alcoholic lager, try Bavaria 0.0% or Cobra Zero. Amstel do a nice zero-alcohol lager too, but I’ve not seen it in the UK.

      1. Sim-O (91 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:30 Permalink | Reply

        It was the only non-alcohol beer I could think of. Rather drink lemonade than non-alcohol beer, really.

        I onced served someone a Kaliber shandy. WTF is the point in that?

        1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:42 Permalink | Reply

          Try try Bavaria 0.0% or Cobra Zero. Seriously. Available in most major supermarkets. Wonderful when ice cold, and a 2x smart move on a hot summer day.

          1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 22:43 Permalink | Reply

            You on a commission or something?

            1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:50 Permalink | Reply

              So I’m a maven. Sue me.

              :o )

              1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 22:58 Permalink | Reply

                What in the name of arse is a ‘maven’?

                1. D-Notice (38 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:34 Permalink | Reply

                  Wikipedia says a trusted expert in a particular field.

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maven

      2. Mark on 31.03.2009 at 22:41 Permalink | Reply

        Sainsbury’s own brand one is the nicest I’ve found, though at 0.5% abv it’s low rather than no alcohol. Becks and Bitburger are both pretty good, and becoming more common in pubs now – the vile Kaliber is gradually getting less common, thank god

  8. Billy (13 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:05 Permalink | Reply

    I’d always recommend blogging when drunk. Better still is commenting on a blog when drunk.

    Don’t take it too far or you will become unable to focus on the screen and your comments will be littered with typos.

  9. Philip (244 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:06 Permalink | Reply

    On the other hand, perhaps Tony is the better Prime Minister because he isn’t Prime Minister any more. This could be more complicated than I thought.

    Caffeine, computer fatigue and the desperate need for an excuse not to work.

  10. Billy (13 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:06 Permalink | Reply

    Oh and forgot to mention: I’ve only had a couple of ales.

  11. D-Notice (38 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:11 Permalink | Reply

    I’ll just be a sober bystander tonight…

  12. Philip (244 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:17 Permalink | Reply

    Ireland’s text on Bloggerheads doesn’t fit into my browser window. What’s the matter with him? Is he afraid?

  13. fatboyfat (21 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:20 Permalink | Reply

    “Leave ‘im Gav, he’s not worth it…”

    Sorry, just trying to add to the overall tone.

  14. BenSix (43 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 22:47 Permalink | Reply

    Fight! Fight! F…oh, what? It’s over?

  15. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 22:59 Permalink | Reply

    Right then. Fresh thread.

    Come on Tim, I sense your hearts not in batting for Blair. Go on, I dare you.

    But back to Brown…

    1. He’s foregone his Prime Minister’s pension until he’s 65. All future Prime Ministers will have to do the same.

    2. Temp workers get same rights as permanent workers after three months.

    3. Free swimming for the over 60s!

    4. Free theatre tickets for young people.

    5. Paul Krugman likes his economic recovery plan.

    And the child poverty by 2020 bit? It’s legally binding not a mission to MArs.

    1. Clive (41 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:09 Permalink | Reply

      Freelance consultants such as myself were royally f**ked by IR35. That was Dawn Primarollo, Gordon’s evil henchwoman way back in 1999. Bet you think that should be a point against Gordon, but no, that’s a swift kick in the nads for Tony for letting Brown have such a free reign through 2 parliaments.

      Think that makes sense, but 2 large Laphroigs, 1 Ledaig and a Bladnoch don’t help much…

    2. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:13 Permalink | Reply

      Go on, I dare you.

      Oooh, I’m scared. You sound like you’re channeling Iain Dale, FFS.

      But back to Brown…1. He’s foregone his Prime Minister’s pension until he’s 65…

      After fucking up everybody else’s. And all those future PMs are on an insigificant red planet orbiting a small unregarded yellow sun in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the galaxy.

      2. Temp workers get same rights as permanent workers after three months.

      I’ll see you and raise you the minium wage.

      3. Free swimming for the over 60s!

      And verrucas for everybody!

      4. Free theatre tickets for young people.

      Yeah, that’ll keep them off the streets. Like they haven’t illegally downloaded all the new releases already.

      Blair at least introduced minimum wage (see above) and more police on the streets. Which, let’s face it, really only addresses the people who hang around in streets. Like bored teenagers.

      Paul Krugman likes his economic recovery plan.

      The Page 3 girls though Blair had a huge cock. So what?

      And the child poverty by 2020 bit? It’s legally binding not a mission to MArs.

      Legally binding does not equal possible. Or now.

      1. Clive (41 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:16 Permalink | Reply

        Ah, but Brown f**ked our pensions on Blair’s watch. Strike against Blair for giving Brown too much freedom and power whilst he played the international statesman.

        1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:21 Permalink | Reply

          OK, point to Justin. He’ll need it.

          4-all.

      2. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 23:18 Permalink | Reply

        What the fuck’s Iain Dale got to do with it? What you bring him up for?

        1. If those orbiting prime ministers want their pensions before 65, they’re going to have to repeal the law, aren’t they? PR disasyer.

        2. Minimum wag does not equal a living wage. HAsn’t stopped a lot of people having to get more than one job to get by.

        3 & 4 – Never heard of bread AND roses?

        1. Clive (41 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:21 Permalink | Reply

          “PR disasyer.”

          Steady with the coronas. But another strike against Blair, put electoral reform in the 1997 manifesto then left the Jenkins Report to gather dust.

        2. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:26 Permalink | Reply

          1. A single pension, even a handsome one, is a drop in the bucket.

          2. So min. wage, no great shakes, but a temp on min. wage having the right to have an extra month of it when sacked is? Please. It’s another drop in the bucket.

          3 & 4 -Bread and roses? What happened to circuses?

          And if you don’t want me to mention Iain Dale, don’t talk shite like him.

          :o )

          1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 23:29 Permalink | Reply

            Fuck off ewith the Dale comparisons, eh?

            Never heard ‘Hearts starve as well as bodies; give us bread, but give us roses!’?

            All these drops oin the bucket as you put it, all add up to something.

            1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:33 Permalink | Reply

              We’re level on 4-all, so you can stop moaning like him, too.

              :o )

              Back on topic, you’ll need more than a few classical quotations and a few drops to fill that bucket.

              What else have you got?

              1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 23:36 Permalink | Reply

                I’m not moaning. What else have you got? I’ve made all the running.

                1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:43 Permalink | Reply

                  I’ve made all the running.

                  Because, all sins aside, Gordon Brown has a lonnng way to go before he equals Tony Blair for achievements. Keep running. And stop moaning. I get enough of that at you-know-who’s place.

                  1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 23:46 Permalink | Reply

                    I’m not moaning. I’ve been all over the shop loooking for stuff about Gordon bastard Brown and you’ve just been pulling stuff off the top of your head and out of your arse. And i’m bored with the iain Dale shit.

                    1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:49 Permalink | Reply

                      I’ve been all over the shop loooking for stuff about Gordon bastard Brown

                      That hard to find, is it? Time to concede, perhaps.

                2. Clive (41 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:44 Permalink | Reply

                  “I’m not moaning. What else have you got? I’ve made all the running.”

                  Cue Tim with an “I’m not your researcher” response?

                  1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:47 Permalink | Reply

                    Hahahahahaha!

                  2. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 23:53 Permalink | Reply

                    Dont you start. It’s bad enough with him banging on about Dale non-stop.

                    1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:55 Permalink | Reply

                      Psst! I’m over here, Just.

                      TBH, if you knew the details of the stunt he pulled after Jenvey’s paedo-smear, you’d be going on about him non-stop too.

                      But let’s get back to your concession speech…

                      1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 23:58 Permalink | Reply (Comments won't nest below this level)

                        Oh hwere go. Shit or get off the pot Tim. Whats the deal with Dale.

                      2. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 01.04.2009 at 00:02 Permalink | Reply

                        Oh, FFS.

                        Look, I’m sick of talking around it. Let me just send you a copy of his bullshit excuse.

                        But it’s time to call it quits tonight, I think. We’re even at 4-all, but the point is proven.

                      3. Justin on 01.04.2009 at 00:05 Permalink | Reply

                        What point? 4-all and I’ve had a few beers – that should count as a win in anybody’s book.

                        Do I want to get into all thuis Dale thing?

                      4. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 01.04.2009 at 00:10 Permalink | Reply

                        You’ll see.

                        Email sent.

                        And you lost. I was just being generous.

                      5. Justin on 01.04.2009 at 00:11 Permalink | Reply

                        How the fuck did I lose?

                      6. Clive (41 comments.) on 01.04.2009 at 00:12 Permalink | Reply

                        Now, now folks. Let’s all group hug and be friendly like.

              2. Sim-O (91 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:37 Permalink | Reply

                What else have you got?

                Fat fingers by the looks of the spellings.

                1. Clive (41 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:42 Permalink | Reply

                  Nah, that’s Corona fingers…

              3. Clive (41 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:40 Permalink | Reply

                Classical? Well Oppenheim’s poem is a good tribute to the Wobblies and Feminists, but not really a classic. Just a bit pretentious. And though the song derived from the poem is nice enough performed by Judy Collins, John Denver covered it too.

                There McKeating, that’ll teach you to ignore my comments.

                1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 23:43 Permalink | Reply

                  Actually I never read it. I sued to go to the pub of the same name in Clapham.

                  And Easy tiger, I wasn’t ignoring you.

                  1. Clive (41 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:47 Permalink | Reply

                    Ah the “Thirst amongst equals” place run by the Workers Beer Co. Used to sell good beer way back when I was last in there.

                2. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:46 Permalink | Reply

                  Ignoring comments, you say?

                  :o )

                  1. Justin on 31.03.2009 at 23:51 Permalink | Reply

                    Sod off.

                    1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:58 Permalink | Reply

                      Heh. Steady on. We’re all friends here.

  16. Clive (41 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:12 Permalink | Reply

    Brown’s a long history of being incapable of standing up and fighting for his position. 1992 – bottled it when Smith became leader; 1994 – bottled it and let Blair become leader. No stomach for hard battles, nightmare trait in a PM.

    1. Tim Ireland (248 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:19 Permalink | Reply

      Cue a very short conversation about confidence and its role in the recession. Blair could have bullshitted our way out of this mess by now, I’m sure. He certainly wouldn’t be stumbling over any lines about being a superhero.

      1. Clive (41 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:28 Permalink | Reply

        Yeah, but then at least Gordon made it into Paul Cornell’s Captain Britain and MI-13 comic series, albeit not as a superhero.

  17. Jim Bliss (150 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:16 Permalink | Reply

    The fact that Brown couldn’t even make himself look good after that monumental turd had been at the controls for a decade speaks volumes. That said, there’s really only one test:

    There they both are. And you’ve only got one egg.

    Easy isn’t it? The only way Brown gets hit is if you’re a bad shot.

    1. Clive (41 comments.) on 31.03.2009 at 23:19 Permalink | Reply

      “There they both are. And you’ve only got one egg.”

      Pray it’s a double yolk? Whisk it up, divide in two and throw at both? Use it to grow a culture of virulent salmonella then infect both? Life presents us with these challenges, but there are always options.

  18. john b (116 comments.) on 01.04.2009 at 01:31 Permalink | Reply

    this is the best moment in blogging *ever*. and Justin clearly wins by holding his own despite being hammerised.

    disappointed the daft ‘brown stole our pensions’ meme went unchallenged. no, he didn’t: demographics did. the transfer of dividend relief to corporation tax cuts is entirely irrelevant.

    (2 double babencourt 5*s. may check in later after more…)

    1. Mark on 01.04.2009 at 10:21 Permalink | Reply

      Also, companies were allowed to take the “surplus” out of pension funds. Which turned out not to have been a surplus at all.

      One of the few advantages of a defined contribution scheme is that the money in your fund definitely belongs to you and won’t be stolen by your employer.

  19. poons on 01.04.2009 at 03:43 Permalink | Reply

    4 cans of special brew
    4 cans of stella

    and I can still see this has more relevance than any debate in the comments of *a certain persons* blog

    I’m marking this a draw

  20. poons on 01.04.2009 at 03:44 Permalink | Reply

    * this may have been posted whilst pisst

  21. [...] marks go to Tim and Justin’s , we have the setup via the Drunk vs Sober deathmatch, Justin’s drunken treachery and Tim’s “Justin McKeating is a Sock Puppeting git” response. You had [...]

Leave a comment




Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your e-mail address is never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

RSS feed for comments on this post.

The URL to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.chickyog.net/2009/03/31/clash-of-the-titans-bloggerheads-vs-chicken-yoghurt-drunk-vs-sober/trackback/