‘Iraq’ archive

The war in Iraq


A ‘new’ politics #6

Imagine you’re fighting two wars. Neither of them seems to being going very well unfortunately. Cock-ups, conspiracies and downright childlike incompetence masquerading as malice have managed to serve up a bloody banquet of bugger all.

You’re losing the media war as well. Stories of your cock-ups, conspiracies and downright childlike incompetence masquerading as malice are rife.

So, what are you to do? Roll up your sleeves, stamp out the cock-ups, debunk the conspiracies and evict the downright childlike incompetence masquerading as malice? Nah. Why bother when you can just choke off the sources of tales of your amateurism? If it’s not in the papers, who cares?

Sorted.

Posted on August 10th, 2007 at 9:04 am

See also
I like this
Asylum seekers: shocking news
Times: Met suppress files that tell full shooting story
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under A 'new' politics, Affronts to democracy, Afghanistan, Iraq, New Labour
 
2 Comments

More petitions

The Downing Street petition for the Iraqi translators is showing 601 signatures at the minute. That’s pretty pisspoor frankly but, let’s face it, what are the lives of a few wog collaborators against, say, road charging? It’s all about capturing the public imagination of course and people can more readily visualise having to cough up a few quid than being drilled in the face. It’s the British disease.

And to muddy the waters further, the Lib Dems thought it useful to split the vote by starting their own petition. Anyway, it only take a few seconds to sign but isn’t sophisticated enough to tell you who and how many have signed up.

Posted on August 8th, 2007 at 4:59 pm

See also
July 7 petition
Say ‘No’ to 42 days
US Newswire: 540,000 Petitions Delivered to President Bush Demanding Truth About Iraq War; Downing Street Memos Trigger Public Outrage Over Deception
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Activism, Iraq, Iraqi interpreters and employees, UK politics
 
11 Comments

Not good enough - update

BBC:

Gordon Brown says he will review the cases of Iraqi interpreters who have been told any claim for asylum in the UK will not be given special treatment.

…but…

No 10 said the issue would be kept under review, but previous decisions were unlikely to be overturned.

These Iraqi interpreters must be kicking themselves. If only they were millionaire businessmen or long distance runners, they’d be sitting pretty and none of this fuss would have happened.

Then the Defence Secretary, the abject Des Browne, said his piece:

He said about 20,000 Iraqis had helped British forces since 2003.

Nice scary number that. 20,000. It should carve off some support for these potential freeloaders and benefit scroungers. That’ll be the Daily Mail and Express vote successfully neutralised if nothing else. It is nice to see that Des has been thoughtfully counting the number of helpful Iraqi citizens. One wonders if he’s keeping count of those being tortured and drilled to death one by one. What do you think?

And how about this…

“That’s why the prime minister has made it clear that we will review how best to [carry out] our duty of care to these people.

“That’s in hand, I have a responsibility on that, as does the foreign secretary and we will report to ministers in the autumn.”

Mr Browne also said the government would “move at the appropriate pace” to get its policy right in relation to duty of care “to all of those whom we have a responsibility to”.

‘In the autumn‘? ‘Appropriate pace’? This isn’t good enough. These people are dying right now. And not by a nice swift, lights-out bullet to the back of the head. They’re being power drilled in the hands and legs and head so their mutilated bodies can serve as warning to others. Those 91 interpreters could be dead ‘in the autumn’.

Do you really want to be on the same side of the argument as somebody as morally compromised as Des Browne? If not, please write to your MP and sign the petition.

Update:
The letters page from today’s Times.

Update updated: The 8.10 slot on Radio 4’s Today programme (RealPlayer required).

And more: Des Browne on the Today programme. May induce vomiting.

More: Jamie is thoughtful on this:

I think it’s unlikely for opsec reasons that there’ll be a formal public announcement. People need to be extracted quietly so as not to tip off the insurgents that the process is underway, for one thing. What seems to have been achieved so far is getting the issue a bit more front and centre. Next job: keeping it there.

As I say in the comments, let’s hope doing it on the quiet is the plan. It doesn’t detract from the fact however that, from the outset, the Government’s default position on this was “fuck ‘em”. Hence people getting turned away from the UK embassy in Damascus and the power-drilled bodies lying about the place.

Posted on August 8th, 2007 at 8:41 am

See also
Good point
Iraqi employees and interpreters: some are on their way
Satan is an amateur, says Smith
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Activism, Iraq, Iraqi interpreters and employees, UK politics
 
3 Comments

We can’t turn them away - MP’s response

Following the letter-writing campaign to highlight the moral obligations we owe to those Iraqis who have worked for the coalition and now face reprisals, I received the following from my MP, Celia Barlow:

By supporting our efforts in southern Iraq, those Iraqis are taking a tremendous risk for themselves and their families.

I agree that we have an obligation to protect Iraqis under threat for supporting the coalition’s efforts to restore order. It is incumbent upon the Government to look at different ways for this to happen, such as studying the US model or discussing this issue with our coalition partners. I welcome your input on this issue and hope to hear a positive outcome for the brave Iraqis contributing to our efforts soon.

So, while good to get a reply, it amounted to little more than a ‘thanks, let’s wait and see’. I think a follow up asking her to refer my letter to the Home Secretary might be in order. Much as Patricia Hewitt did for one of her constituents. Or maybe I should ask for a referral to the Foreign Secretary much as David Lammy did for Davide. Dan Hardie has more.

This is from the Times today:

The Times has learnt that the Government has ignored personal appeals from senior army officers in Basra to relax asylum regulations and make special arrangements for Iraqis whose loyal services have put their lives at risk.

One interpreter, who has worked with the Army since 2004 and wanted to start a new life in Britain after British Forces pull out was told by Downing Street that he would receive no special favours and to read a government website.

If you wrote a letter to your MP and received a reply post it on your blog (or if you don’t have a blog let me know and I can post it for you if you like) and let me know and I’ll link back to as many as I can find. There’s still ample opportunity to write a letter if you haven’t already - some guidelines are here - and a letter can be sent online using Write To Them. (Update: It’s worth stressing the urgency of this situation when writing your letter - these people are being tortured and murdered right now.)

Also, please sign the Downing Street petition. There’s also a Facebook group.

Responses so far:

Conservatives (1):
Anne Milton

Labour (9):
Celia Barlow
Hugh Bayley
Wayne David
Frank Dobson
Patricia Hewitt
David Lammy
Andrew Smith
Dr Rudi Vis
Paul Truswell (via Ian Clenshaw)

Lib Dems (2):
John Barrett

Robert Smith

Posted on August 7th, 2007 at 9:42 am

See also
Iraqi employees: MPs responses so far
Iraqi employees campaign latest MP responses
Iraqi employees campaign latest
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Activism, Iraq, Iraqi interpreters and employees, UK politics
 
27 Comments

Reuters AlertNet: Grim camps for Iraqis avoid the ‘pull factor’

Refugee workers call it the “pull factor” — camps with conditions comfortable enough to attract people in a country where an average of 60,000 Iraqis a month are driven from their homes by sectarian violence.

So the challenge for aid workers is to provide safe havens that do not invite permanence. The Qawala camp on the outskirts of Sulaimaniya in northern Kurdistan, a haven of stability in a treacherous country, fits the bill.

Conditions are unlikely to pull in all but the most desperate.

read the rest

Posted on August 3rd, 2007 at 12:02 am

See also
…but at least they’re our bastards #4578
John Harris: The slow death of the Real Job is pulling society apart
Curious Hamster: A Thought Experiment
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Chicken Nuggets, Iraq
 
1 Comment

Moral imperative

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to offer asylum in the UK to the Iraqis who have been working as translators and in other capacities for the UK armed forces.

Posted on July 29th, 2007 at 12:13 pm

See also
July 7 petition
BBC NEWS: Danish army evacuates 200 Iraqis
Iraqi employees: one down
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Activism, Iraq, Iraqi interpreters and employees
 
Comments Off

Hitchens: crowing from the wreckage

This and this (where I get called ‘You fanny’ in the comments - with Hitchens I’m in good company; at least I won’t be thirsty).

Posted on July 25th, 2007 at 10:43 am

See also
Hitchens
Christopher Hitchens gets waterboarded
The bon mots of Christopher Hitchens
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Iraq
 
4 Comments

We can’t turn them away UPDATED

Dan Hardie has suggested petitioning members of parliament on the matter of Iraqis who have worked for the British forces in Southern Iraq who now fine themselves in increasing danger. It seems that, now they’ve done their bit, they’re on their own, thanks. We’re turning them away and they have to make for the borders in the hope of reaching safety in neighbouring countries.

Here’s some guidelines and pointers for writing to your MP.

***

Since British troops occupied Southern Iraq in the spring of 2003, thousands of Iraqi citizens have worked for the British Army, the Coalition Provisional Authority (South) and for contractors serving UK forces. There is now considerable evidence that their lives, and the lives of their families, are at risk: some former workers for the British have been murdered, and many others have fled to neighbouring countries or gone into hiding in Basra.

The British Government, for whom they were ultimately working, has not offered them the right of asylum in the UK. This is morally unacceptable. It is also unnecessary, since we are well able to accommodate several thousand Iraqi refugees, most of whom already speak English and all of whom have already worked for our country.

The most detailed recent report, by Jonathan Miller of Channel Four News, notes the murder of 17 translators in one single incident in Basra. It cites the cases of hundreds of others who have fled to a refugee existence in nearby Middle Eastern countries or are in hiding in Iraq. The British Government response has come from the Home Office, which has suggested that Iraqis put at risk by their work for British troops ‘register with the UN refugee agency’. Other reports provide supporting detail: Iraqis are being targeted for murder because they have worked for British forces. (See here and here.)

Marie Colvin’s report for the Times of April 8 speaks of desperate former workers for the British Army being turned away from the British embassy in Syria by staff who had orders not to admit any Iraqis. These brave men and women have testimonials written by British officers stating that they are at risk from jihadi violence: and yet we are still refusing to admit them to the United Kingdom.

If you feel that this is unacceptable and that Britain should prevent Iraqis from being murdered for the ‘crime’ of working for British troops, could you please write to your MP and ask him or her to press the Government for action. You can use the excellent website ‘Write to Them‘ or post a letter yourself.

Please be courteous when writing to your MP. It would be a good idea to read the reports above, and cite relevant facts. We would suggest that your letter could contain the following points:

  • It is morally unacceptable that Britain should abandon people who are at risk because they worked for British soldiers and diplomats.
  • This country will be shamed if any more Iraqis are murdered for the ‘crime’ of having supported UK forces.
  • Iraqis who worked for British forces should not be told to leave Iraq and throw themselves on the mercy of United Nations relief agencies in Arab countries: these agencies are already being overwhelmed by the outflow of Iraqi refugees, and Iraqi refugees who have worked for British diplomats or troops may well be targeted by local jihadists.
  • There is plentiful evidence that armed groups in Iraq kill the families of those they consider ‘enemies’: for this reason we must extend the right of asylum to the families of those who worked for us.
  • It is entirely practical for this country’s troops in Iraq, and its embassies in neighbouring countries, to take in Iraqis who have worked for us and fly them to the UK. Indeed, there is already considerable anger among British servicemen that Iraqis are being abandoned in this way.
  • This country is large enough and rich enough to accommodate several thousand Iraqi refugees. Denmark has already given asylum to all 200 Iraqis who worked for its smaller occupying force.
  • It does not matter what your MP’s views (or what your views) are on the invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq. People who risked their lives for this country’s soldiers are now being abandoned by the British Government. Their lives can and must be saved by their being granted the right of asylum in this country.
  • This policy should be implemented regardless of whether British soldiers stay in Iraq or are soon withdrawn. But it must be introduced soon: applications for asylum cannot be processed in a lengthy fashion, as the security situation in Basra is deteriorating rapidly, and delay is likely to lead to further killings of Iraqis who worked for British troops.

***

It is best that those of us deciding to write a letter do so in a personal fashion - form letters and mass-mailouts are frowned upon by our elected representatives and often end up in the bin.

Dan suggests tagging five other bloggers to pass the message on but I’d like to instead ask that anybody reading this post on their own blogs and write a letter themselves. Feel free to cut and paste this copy into blogs or into emails to non-blogging friends who might also write to their MP.

Update: And there’s this:

The United States ambassador in Iraq, Ryan Cocker, has called for all Iraqis working for the US government to be granted refugee status in recognition of the dangers they face.

Update: Davide has set up this petition. Please sign if you’d be so kind.

Posted on July 23rd, 2007 at 9:40 am

See also
Iraqi employees: one down
We can’t turn them away - MP’s response
Iraqi employees campaign: not over yet
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Activism, Iraq, Iraqi interpreters and employees, UK politics
 
19 Comments

BBC NEWS: Danish army evacuates 200 Iraqis

The Danish military has secretly airlifted out of the country about 200 Iraqis who were helping its troops.

The Iraqi civilians, mostly those working as aides and translators in the southern region of Basra, will now be offered asylum in Denmark.

read the rest

Update: Jamie does a Danish/British compare and contrast.

Posted on July 20th, 2007 at 8:35 am

See also
Iraqi employees: one down
We can’t turn them away UPDATED
Moral imperative
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Chicken Nuggets, Iraq, T.W.A.T.
 
3 Comments

Omerta

Shocking scenes in Westminster when an Iraqi man was assaulted by two attackers. One beat the man, took his money and left him bleeding in the gutter. The other attacker - bizarrely - merely tickled the man’s feet.

A witness to the assault, blogger Oliver Kamm, later gave a statement to the police. While Mr Kamm was unable to say anything about the person who beat and robbed the Iraqi, he was able to give detailed chapter and verse on the feet-tickler.

And thus the streets are kept safe.

Update: Shocking scenes in Westminster when an Iraqi man etc etc…

Witnesses to the assault, Harry’s Place, later gave a statement blah blah…

Posted on July 18th, 2007 at 10:12 am

See also
Harry’s Place down
Beyond the wit of mortal man
Guardian: Guardian finds Afghan witnesses US couldn’t
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Blog, bloggers and blogging, Iraq, UK politics
 
4 Comments

The Yorkshire Ranter: Burn this filth

TYR can exclusively reveal that the Iraqi insurgency is being funded by the trade in a toxic, explosive, and highly addictive substance that is peddled on Britain’s streets. Junkies, known as “petrol heads”, are willing to spend almost anything to get their hands on their next “tank”. It offers them a passing sense of boundless power and confidence - but the downsides include thousands of people a year being killed and injured, billions of tonnes of CO2 emissions, and our cities filled with toxic, stinking smoke. Millions of Britons are sending vast sums of money to foreign pushers - many of whom are in league with our enemies - enough money to make it a significant contribution to the trade deficit. Even as we speak, oil dealers are selling their wares only a few hundred yards from my keyboard.

read the rest

Posted on July 8th, 2007 at 6:19 pm

See also
John Harris: The slow death of the Real Job is pulling society apart
Rachel From North London: 90 days and 90 nights
Links and stuff between June 12th and June 13th
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Afghanistan, Chicken Nuggets, Iraq, T.W.A.T.
 
Comments Off

Blood & Treasure: integrate this

Muslims, non-Muslims, the SWP, MI6, lefties, righties, soggy wet liberals, feral libertarians, believers, atheists…one thing I’ve never seen mentioned about the big antiwar march before the Iraq war took place is the fact that it was the most politically representative gathering in British history. It wasn’t a gang of fanatics out there; they were on the other side. It was we-the-people, including us-the-Muslims. If integration is the basis of your counter-terrorism strategy, you couldn’t build from a better starting point than acknowledging that we were right.

read the rest

Posted on July 8th, 2007 at 8:54 am

See also
Tony giveth, Hazel taketh away
UK: New entry on the Axis of Evil
Matthew Norman: Blair let me down
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Chicken Nuggets, Iraq, T.W.A.T., The home front
 
Comments Off

Jim Bliss - Lord Goldsmith: The biggest balls in Britain?

Now, there’s no doubt in my mind that Lord Goldsmith’s role during the past few years has essentially been to try and convince anyone who’ll listen that New Labour’s participation in the outright destruction of a sovereign nation — I’m talking about Iraq here, not the UK — and murder of between 2 and 3 percent of the population, is completely legal and above-board. Whenever Tony Blair did something that should rightly land him in a cell in The Hague, Lord Goldsmith popped up and said it was completely legal and above-board. There’s a P.R. agent in the novel I’m writing. His name is Henry Stone and it’s his job to spin the actions of a rich psychopath so that they appear completely legal and above-board. He’s a bit part, not a significant character, but the consequences of his actions have serious ramifications and permit said psychopath to continue his nastiness. In the language of psychology we would describe Henry Stone as “an enabler”.

read the rest

Posted on June 29th, 2007 at 7:30 pm

See also
Not Dead Only Sleeping: The Attorney General’s Advice
…and telling you its raining
Peter Wilby: Friends in high places
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Chicken Nuggets, Human rights, Iraq, UK politics
 
Comments Off

FLASHBACK: Blair jumps the gun

This from the comments at Blairwatch: Prime Minister’s Questions on June 4 2003:

I say, with the greatest respect to the right hon. Gentleman, that the fact is that in the end there have been many claims made about the Iraq conflict. It was claimed that hundreds of thousands of people were going to die in it; that it would be my Vietnam; that the Middle East would be in flames; and — the latest claim — that weapons of mass destruction were a complete invention by the British Government. The truth is that some people resent the fact that it was right to go to conflict. We won the conflict; thanks to the magnificent contribution of the British troops, Iraq is now free, and we should be proud of that.

RealPlayer video here, Windows Media video here.

Posted on June 27th, 2007 at 10:21 pm

See also
A tale of two tallies
Monbiot: Nuking the Treaty
Turning ploughshares into swords
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Blair, Iraq
 
2 Comments

Between the Hammer and the Anvil: Progress!

I’m sure most of you heard of the non-lethal weapons that the US Dept. of Defense looked at creating - the “Gay bomb” and the “Halitosis bomb” being my favourites.

Well, it looks pretty obvious to me that they’ve succeeded in developing an Al-Qaedification bomb - a weapon that strikes targets and transforms them from Iraqis into dead Al-Qaeda militants in the blink of an eye.

read the rest

Posted on June 27th, 2007 at 9:24 am

See also
Feeling the heat
Depends what you mean by ‘lethal’
The Independent: US lied to Britain over use of napalm in Iraq war
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Chicken Nuggets, Iraq
 
Comments Off

And another thing

If I hear one more person say ‘the whole world believed’ Saddam had WMD (as Peter Hain does in the video in the post below), I’m going to go around saying the whole world believes they have a really tiny knob. Even if that person is a woman.

The whole world believes Peter Hain has a really tiny knob.

Posted on June 25th, 2007 at 10:28 am

See also
Peter Hain’s Back Door
The Profligate Peter Hain
Going the distance
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Iraq
 
2 Comments

Olbermann

Transcript here.

Posted on May 25th, 2007 at 10:32 am

See also
The Weekly Olbermann
The Weekly Olbermann
The Weekly Olbermann
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Iraq, T.W.A.T., US Politics
 
Comments Off

Arse about face - updated

The Bush administration is developing plans to “internationalise” the Iraq crisis, including an expanded role for the United Nations, as a way of reducing overall US responsibility for Iraq’s future and limiting domestic political fallout from the war as the 2008 election season approaches.

Not that it’s the Bush Administration’s fault, obviously. We asked those damn Iraqis to clean the toilet after we’d been but the smell’s chased them off, the wusses.

“[US commander, General David] Petraeus is brilliant. But he is the captain of a sinking ship,” said a former senior administration official who questioned whether Iraq’s divided political leadership could prevent a descent into chaos. “Iraq’s government is a mobile phone number that doesn’t answer. Iraq probably can’t be fixed.”

Well, Jalal Talabani should be easy to find, if nobody else. He’s in a celebrity fat club in Minnesota. The same one used by such alpha specimens as JFK and (I love this) man’s man Ernest Hemingway.

Meanwhile, Tony Blair continues his victory parade. As part of his ‘Son of Krypton 2007′ tour, he’s making a speech to the UN. It’s eerily familiar:

CHECK ON DELIVERY

Clear this mess up for me, would you?

Thank you.

He will then proceed to the nearest restaurant, have a slap-up feed and then wriggle through the bog window without paying.

Update: But what’s this? Good news from Iraq? Don’t look now but the economy in Southern Iraq might be on the up and up. Through opium cultivation. Hooray!

Posted on May 23rd, 2007 at 8:30 am

See also
Counting the calories if not the bodies
Why not paint a bloody big target on him as well?
It’s a metaphor
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Iraq, T.W.A.T.
 
1 Comment

Counting the calories if not the bodies

So anyway. While his country is going to hell, Iraqi president Jalal Talabani is feeling the burn.

In Minnesota.

In a fat camp.

Incogitable.

(via)

Posted on May 21st, 2007 at 8:18 pm

See also
Arse about face - updated
Can somebody please explain to me…
For the last time: It’s not about the oil
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Iraq, T.W.A.T.
 
2 Comments

Meanwhile, away from all the wailing and weeping…

Posted on May 11th, 2007 at 10:21 am

See also
And short back and sides for all
Children: The cause of and solution to all of life’s problems
And after all, he’s our wonderwall
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Iraq, T.W.A.T., US Politics
 
1 Comment

Like a monkey with a miniature cymbal

We’ve been here a thousand times before. Is Blair mad, bad, a liar or what? In the end, does it matter? It’s still important to challenge his shitty fictions wherever he smears them though. Here’s Prime Minister’s Questions yesterday.

Menzies Campbell (Fife North East, Liberal Democrat)
But is it not clear where responsibility for Iraq lies? The President made the decisions, the Prime Minister argued the case, the Chancellor signed the cheques and the Tories voted it through. That is where the responsibility for Iraq is to be found.

Tony Blair (Prime Minister)
And if the right hon. and learned Gentleman’s policy had been implemented, Saddam Hussein and his two sons would still be running Iraq.

Here’s Blair on February 25 2003:

Tony Blair (Prime Minister)
I detest his regime—I hope most people do—but even now, he could save it by complying with the UN’s demand. Even now, we are prepared to go the extra step to achieve disarmament peacefully.

For an added bonus, here’s stupid old tosser Dennis Skinner making cheap cracks about suicide bombers.

Posted on May 3rd, 2007 at 11:50 am

See also
The Blair legacy continues to congeal
Blair and the death penalty: Leaving us dangling
Halabja? That rings a bell.
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Blair, Iraq, T.W.A.T., UK politics
 
Comments Off

Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity…

Quick nurse, the screens:

Prime Minister Tony Blair has told reporters he would be “delighted” if his child wanted to serve in Iraq.

(Link via Jim)

Posted on April 27th, 2007 at 8:28 am

See also
2007: A look back
Edifying
Like a monkey with a miniature cymbal
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Blair, Iraq, T.W.A.T., UK politics
 
11 Comments

Strangely Browne

I have expressed a degree of regret than can be equated to an apology

For God’s sake. Is there any other walk of life where that kind of talk wouldn’t get you punched in the face? The sooner these dickheads are gone the better.

Posted on April 17th, 2007 at 8:19 am

See also
David Miliband: Regrets, he’s had a few. But then again…
Walking the walk
Life on other planets
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Iran, Iraq, New Labour, T.W.A.T., UK politics
 
16 Comments

Terry Jones: Call that humiliation?

I share the outrage expressed in the British press over the treatment of our naval personnel accused by Iran of illegally entering their waters. It is a disgrace. We would never dream of treating captives like this - allowing them to smoke cigarettes, for example, even though it has been proven that smoking kills. And as for compelling poor servicewoman Faye Turney to wear a black headscarf, and then allowing the picture to be posted around the world - have the Iranians no concept of civilised behaviour? For God’s sake, what’s wrong with putting a bag over her head? That’s what we do with the Muslims we capture: we put bags over their heads, so it’s hard to breathe. Then it’s perfectly acceptable to take photographs of them and circulate them to the press because the captives can’t be recognised and humiliated in the way these unfortunate British service people are.

read the rest

Posted on March 31st, 2007 at 11:20 am

See also
Downing Street does auto-fellatio
Brandgate: the public resigns
Strangely Browne
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Chicken Nuggets, Iran, Iraq, T.W.A.T.
 
64 Comments

Iraq vs The Rest Of The World: half time summary

Well, it’s half time in the Iraq vs the Rest Of The World football match. For those just joining us you’ve missed some amazing action in the last four years, and although the score remains unclear at this stage both sides still have all to play for.

Eyebrows were raised early in the game over the sacking of Iraqi manager Saddam Hussein while play was ongoing. In amazing scenes, the team saw a succession of managers come and go as the match failed to go in Iraq’s favour. Garner, Bremer and Allawi were all found wanting and dismissed. Current manager Nouri al-Maliki reluctantly took up the reigns and has expressed his intention to leave the job after the game.

Our experts in the studio expressed surprise at the Rest Of The World team only fielding eight players, the thinking clearly being that an understrength side would easily beat an apparently demoralised Iraqi eleven. A big mistake which saw several own goals scored early doors. The mix of the away team is also strange. European talent is clearly lacking and the underperforming British players look certain to be substituted in the second half. Some players have also complained that their kit isn’t up to scratch with cheap boots, missing shin pads and no team physio for those players taking knocks.

Questions have also been asked about the refereeing of the match with both sides ignoring reffing decisions. Match referee Annan was controversially replaced just before half time by Ban Ki-Moon who has so far failed to stamp his authority on the game.

The Iraqi’s substitutions during the first half have seen an influx of foreign talent using some dubious tactics. The strategy by some of the Iraqi players of involving the crowd was unorthodox but worked in turning the fans against the Rest Of The World team. Offers from the Rest Of The World coaching squad to train some of the Iraqi players has been met with some scepticism. It’s widely doubted that the money is available for the grooming of new talent and whether inexperienced players will be able to make an impact.

Late in the half, Rest Of The World brought on several more attacking players in an attempt to put the game beyond the Iraqis’ reach. The home team’s attacking players responded by largely melting away but their defence is still looking pretty solid.

News just coming in says the chairman of the Rest Of The World, dissatisfied with his team’s performance, might declare them the winner at some point in the second half and take his ball home.

And with the whistle being blown for the second half, it’s back to our commentators to tell us how the game’s going - Tony and
George.

(First published in this week’s edition of The Friday Thing. Go and subscribe, it’s really good.)

Posted on March 23rd, 2007 at 4:46 pm

See also
Brand on the World Cup
Are you listening Phil Scolari?
Closing time again
   
Permalink
Trackback
Subscribe
Print

• Filed under Iraq, Off Yoghurt, T.W.A.T., The Friday Thing
 
2 Comments